# Quantitative assessment of lung opacities from CT of pulmonary artery imaging data in COVID-19 patients: artificial intelligence versus radiologist

**Authors:** Ann Mari Svensson, Anna Kistner, Kristina Kairaitis, G Kim Prisk, Catherine Farrow, Terence Amis, Peter D Wagner, Atul Malhotra, Piotr Harbut

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/bjro/tzaf008 · BJR Open · 2025-04-29

## TL;DR

This study compares AI and radiologists in measuring lung opacities in CT scans of early-stage COVID-19 patients, showing AI provides reliable results.

## Contribution

Demonstrates that AI trained on non-contrast CT scans works well with contrast-enhanced images for assessing lung opacities in COVID-19.

## Key findings

- AI showed strong correlation (r2=0.70) with radiologists' average estimates of lung opacities.
- Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal bias between AI and radiologists, with no outliers.
- AI tools can complement radiologists in clinical workflows for timely decision-making.

## Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) deep learning algorithms trained on non-contrast CT scans effectively detect and quantify acute COVID-19 lung involvement. Our study explored whether radiological contrast affects the accuracy of AI-measured lung opacities, potentially impacting clinical decisions. We compared lung opacity measurements from AI software with visual assessments by radiologists using CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) images of early-stage COVID-19 patients.

This prospective single-centre study included 18 COVID-19 patients who underwent CTPA due to suspected pulmonary embolism. Patient demographics, clinical data, and 30-day and 90-day mortality were recorded. AI tool (Pulmonary Density Plug-in, AI-Rad Companion Chest CT, SyngoVia; Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) was used to estimate the quantity of opacities. Visual quantitative assessments were performed independently by 2 radiologists.

There was a positive correlation between radiologist estimations (r2 = 0.57) and between the AI data and the mean of the radiologists’ estimations (r2 = 0.70). Bland-Altman plot analysis showed a mean bias of +3.06% between radiologists and −1.32% between the mean radiologist vs AI, with no outliers outside 2×SD for respective comparison.

The AI protocol facilitated a quantitative assessment of lung opacities and showed a strong correlation with data obtained from 2 independent radiologists, demonstrating its potential as a complementary tool in clinical practice.

In assessing COVID-19 lung opacities in CTPA images, AI tools trained on non-contrast images, provide comparable results to visual assessments by radiologists.

The Pulmonary Density Plug-in enables quantitative analysis of lung opacities in COVID-19 patients using contrast-enhanced CT images, potentially streamlining clinical workflows and supporting timely decision-making.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** thromboembolism (MESH:D013923), pleural effusion (MESH:D010996), AI (MESH:C538142), atelectasis (MESH:D001261), obese (MESH:D009765), emphysema (MESH:D004646), COPD (MESH:D029424), calcifications (MESH:D002114), pulmonary emboli (MESH:D020766), respiratory diseases (MESH:D012140), Bronchial dilatation (MESH:D001982), PE (MESH:D011655), pneumonia (MESH:D011014), pulmonary emphysema (MESH:D011656), vertebral osteophytes (MESH:D054850), ARDS (MESH:D012128), death (MESH:D003643), opacities (MESH:D003318), inflammation (MESH:D007249), fibrosis (MESH:D005355), OP (MESH:D000092124), CP (MESH:C000721427), pleural diseases (MESH:D010995), lung (MESH:D008171), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), alveolar damage (MESH:D055370)
- **Chemicals:** oxygen (MESH:D010100), Iomeron (MESH:C057937)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (no rank) [taxon 2697049]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12077292/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12077292/full.md

## References

26 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12077292/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12077292