# Comparing the outcome after double level osteotomies in severe valgus and varus knees

## TL;DR

This study compares the outcomes of double level osteotomies in patients with severe varus and valgus knee deformities, finding that both groups improved clinically, but with different patterns of joint angle correction.

## Contribution

The study is the first to report clinical outcomes of valgus double level osteotomies, providing a direct comparison with varus cases.

## Key findings

- Both varus and valgus groups showed significant improvement in clinical scores post-surgery.
- Valgus knees showed greater overall improvement, starting from worse preoperative scores.
- JLCA normalized in valgization DLO but not in varization DLO, a key consideration for surgical planning.

## Abstract

Osteotomies have played an important role in joint preservation surgery of the knee joint for many years. A double level osteotomy is performed for severe varus or valgus deformities. There are numerous publications on double level osteotomies for severe varus deformities, whereas there are no publications on valgus deformities. The hypothesis of this study was to compare the clinical outcome after varus DLO with that after valgus DLO.

In this retrospective study, 40 DLOs were followed up in 34 patients. In group one (13 cases, age 45.6 (16–61) years) a varization DLO was performed, in group two (24 cases, age 48.3 (20–61) years) a valgization DLO was performed. The pre- and postoperative clinical scores were recorded: Tegner Activity score, Japanese knee society Score and Lysholm Score. The leg axis and knee joint angles were recorded and compared pre- and postoperatively.

The follow-up period was 24 (6–81) months. The follow-up rate was 73% (27/37). The preoperative leg axis in group one showed an average valgus of 15.9° (9–40°). Group two had an average varus of 12° (8–21°). Postoperatively, the leg axis was 3.4° varus in group one and 0.5° valgus in group two. The mLDFA changed in group one from 83.2° to 90.9°, the MPTA from 95.5° to 87.0°. In group two, the mLDFA changed from 91.9° to 85.9° and the MPTA from 83.3° to 88.3° on average. The JLCA changed in group one from − 3.2 (− 5°–0°) to − 0.5° (− 3–2°) postoperative and in group two from 3.3° (1–8°) to 3.0° (0–6°) postoperative. Tegner score, Lysholm score and Japanese knee Society score all improved significantly in both groups. Patients with a valgus axis have worse clinical scores before surgery than the varus group, but the varus group shows a higher potential for improvement postoperatively. Every patient stated that they would have the operation performed again. Complications were rare, two overcorrections required corrective surgery. Two hinge fractures were treated intraoperatively with additional contralateral plate osteosynthesis.

Patients show very good clinical results after DLO. The improvements in the valgus knees are greater, but starting from a lower preoperative level, probably due to improvements in both the lateral compartment and the patellofemoral compartment. An important finding was that JLCA is normalizing in valgization DLO but not in varization DLO. This needs to be considered in planning a DLO.