# A Comparison of the Electrochemical Oxidative Dissolution of Pyrite and Chalcopyrite in Dilute Nitric Acid Solution

**Authors:** Samaneh Teimouri, Johannes Herman Potgieter, Caren Billing

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/open.202400053 · ChemistryOpen · 2025-04-02

## TL;DR

This paper compares how pyrite and chalcopyrite dissolve in nitric acid using electrochemical methods to better extract gold trapped in these minerals.

## Contribution

The study reveals how pyrite and chalcopyrite behave during electrochemical oxidation in nitric acid, focusing on dissolution mechanisms and gold extraction potential.

## Key findings

- Pyrite forms a sulfur-rich layer at low potentials, causing diffusion-controlled dissolution.
- Chalcopyrite produces iron-deficient sulfides at low potentials, which convert to soluble species at higher potentials.
- Both minerals show extensive oxidation above 0.7 V, removing diffusion barriers and enhancing dissolution.

## Abstract

Understanding the oxidation of sulfidic minerals, especially those of pyrite and chalcopyrite, under acidic conditions has important outcomes, such as exposing any encapsulated gold not recovered by traditional cyanidation processes. This study focused on the electrochemical oxidation of pyrite and chalcopyrite in a 0.5 M nitric acid solution. Electrochemical techniques were employed, using the minerals as working electrodes. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed to detect redox processes and resulting products were suggested. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was run at specific potentials corresponding to oxidation processes detected to further probe the reaction mechanism. For pyrite at low anodic potentials (0.4–0.6 V vs Ag/AgCl), Fe1‐xS2 and Fe(OH)3 with a sulfur‐rich layer which forms S0 accumulates on the electrode surface, leading to diffusion controlled dissolution processes. Above 0.7 V, the pyrite is fully oxidised, eradicating the diffusion barrier and extensive oxidation occurs at high potentials (0.9 V). Similar processes occurred for chalcopyrite with mainly iron‐deficient sulfides (like Cu1‐xFe1‐yS2‐z, CuS2, CuS) forming at low potentials (0.3–0.5 V), and S0 partially covering the surface causing a diffusion barrier. Increasing the potential to beyond 0.7 V leads to these layers converting to soluble species.

This research was primarily driven by the aim to extract residual encapsulated gold in sulfidic minerals, which would require the dissolution of the mineral. The electrochemical oxidation of pyrite and chalcopyrite in 0.5 M nitric acid was investigated here, using cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, to see if there are any differences compared to when sulfuric acid is used.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** nitric acid (PubChem CID 944), sulfuric acid (PubChem CID 1118), Fe(OH)3 (PubChem CID 445709)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12075099/full.md

## Figures

14 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12075099/full.md

## References

39 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12075099/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12075099