# Health-state utility values and their time to deterioration in informal caregivers of older patients with chronic diseases

**Authors:** Astrid Pozet, Antoine Falcoz, Cécile Roller, Taha Jai, Aurelia Meurisse, Virginie Nerich

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1531608 · Frontiers in Public Health · 2025-04-30

## TL;DR

This study tracked the health of caregivers for older patients with chronic diseases over two years to see how their well-being changed over time.

## Contribution

The study provides a detailed catalog of health-state utility values for caregivers at different time points, useful for economic evaluations.

## Key findings

- Health-state utility values remained stable over time with a median score of 0.80 at 24 months.
- 62% of caregivers experienced deterioration in health-state utility values within a median time of 9.1 months.
- Social worker support did not significantly affect the time to deterioration in caregivers' health-state utility values.

## Abstract

This study aimed to assess health state utility values (HSUVs) in caregivers of older patients with chronic diseases receiving or not receiving social worker support.

This multicentric open-label randomized study assigned caregivers to receive either an informational booklet alone or one accompanied by social worker support. Caregivers completed EQ-5D-3L each semester for 24 months. We reported caregiver HSUVs at baseline and after 6, 12, 18, and 24 months using EQ-5D-3L utility index scores and exploring their time to deterioration (TTD).

Among 179 included caregivers, the percentage reporting some or extreme problems on five EQ-5D-3L dimensions remained almost stable over time with a median EQ-5D-3L utility index score of 0.89 [0.80–1.00] at baseline (n = 177), 0.80 [0.80–0.89] at M6 (n = 125), and 0.80 [0.73–0.91] at M24 (n = 81). Among the respondents, 62% (n = 109) experienced a deterioration in EQ-5D-3L utility index score, with a median TTD of 9.1 months [95%CI 6.2–14.9] in the control group (CG) and 9.5 months [6.3–14.4] in the supportive intervention group (SIG) (HR = 1.06 [0.73–1.54]), p-value = 0.76.

Our study provides a catalog of HSUVs across different caregiver profiles and at various follow-up time points, which can inform future economic evaluations.

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02626377.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** anxiety (MESH:D001007), mental health (OMIM:603663), neurodegenerative disease (MESH:D019636), pain (MESH:D010146), stroke (MESH:D020521), death (MESH:D003643), neurovascular disease (MESH:D013901), depression (MESH:D003866), cancer (MESH:D009369), idiopathic Parkinson's or Alzheimer's disease (MESH:D010300), age-related macular degeneration (MESH:D008268), TTD (MESH:D000377), chronic diseases (MESH:D002908), AMD (MESH:D006009), breast, prostate, or colorectal (MESH:D011472)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12074913/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12074913/full.md

## References

27 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12074913/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12074913