# Long-Term Outcomes of Cementless Versus Hybrid Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

## TL;DR

A study compared cementless and hybrid cemented knee replacements over 10 years and found similar long-term outcomes.

## Contribution

This study provides long-term (10-year) comparative data on cementless versus hybrid cemented total knee arthroplasty.

## Key findings

- Both cementless and hybrid cemented TKAs showed similar 10-year revision rates and clinical scores.
- Cementless fixation had a significantly shorter operative time by 10 minutes on average.
- Radiographic signs of loosening were not significantly different between the two groups.

## Abstract

Background: Although cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered the standard fixation technique, the emerging trend toward cementless fixation has created the need for a detailed comparison. In a previous study, we reported the 5-year results comparing cementless and hybrid cemented TKAs using the same implant design. The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term follow-up at a minimum of 10 years. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 120 TKAs (60 cementless, 60 hybrid cemented) conducted between 2003 and 2007 using the e.motion posterior cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis with a floating-platform mobile polyethylene bearing (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany). Demographic and clinical data were collected; radiographic follow-up was performed with attention to signs of loosening, while complications and revision surgery were assessed using competing risk analysis. Operative time was recorded as an indicator of surgical efficiency. Results: At 10 years, 59 TKAs (54 patients) were available for long-term follow-up. Both fixation groups demonstrated significant improvement in Knee Society Scores (KSSs) compared to preoperative values (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in KSSs between the two groups at 10 years follow-up (p = 0.480). The 10-year cumulative incidence of revision was 8.4% in both groups (p = 0.721), and that of aseptic loosening was identical at 3.4% (p = 0.967). Although radiolucent lines were noted in three tibial components of the cementless group, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.075). Notably, the cementless group demonstrated a significantly shorter operative time with a mean difference of 10 min (p = 0.017). Conclusions: At a minimum follow-up of 10 years, there were no significant differences between the hybrid cemented and cementless groups in revision rates, cumulative incidences, clinical scores, or radiological signs of loosening, confirming the long-term effectiveness of both fixation methods in clinical practice.