# Improving Laser Powder Bed Fusion IN718 Process Development Efficiency by Eliminating Pore Defects of Specified Size

**Authors:** Yuzhong Wang, Wenhua Guo, Wenxian Li, Yaru Zhang, Kaiyue Ma, Qianyu Ji, Rui Han, Yihui Zhang, Chenwei Wang, Sihang Zhao, Bingheng Lu

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/ma18091929 · Materials · 2025-04-24

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a new method to improve laser powder bed fusion by eliminating specific-size pores, leading to higher density and better mechanical properties in IN718 parts.

## Contribution

A novel DPSEM method is introduced to evaluate porosity data and accelerate the identification of optimal process windows in L-PBF.

## Key findings

- The DPSEM method achieved a maximum density of 99.5% by eliminating 90 μm pores.
- The method produced parts with an ultimate tensile strength of 1155 MPa and yield strength of 908 MPa.
- The RD model resulted in lower density and compromised mechanical performance due to pore accumulation and compound precipitation.

## Abstract

The rapid identification of process windows in laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing garnered significant attention for its ability to reduce upfront engineering costs. This study focuses on accelerating the development of process windows by targeting the elimination of specific-size pore defects in L-PBF IN718. A novel relative density–porosity similarity evaluation method (DPSEM) is introduced to evaluate the reliability of porosity data derived from computed tomography (CT). Using the response surface method, the fully dense forming window (e.g., relative density ≥ 99%) was accurately located within a wide process parameter range (18–1000 J/mm3) in a single test. Comparative analysis with the relative density (RD) model highlighted differences in solution set distribution, positioning efficiency, microstructure, and performance within the process window. Results demonstrate that the proposed method effectively eliminates specified size defects (90 μm), achieving a maximum density of 99.5% alongside excellent mechanical properties, including an ultimate tensile strength of 1155 MPa and a yield strength of 908 MPa. In contrast, the RD model achieved a lower maximum density of 98.5%, with mechanical performance compromised by significant MC compound precipitation and keyhole pore accumulation, resulting in an ultimate tensile strength slightly exceeding 910 MPa.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** MC (MESH:C061001), IN718 (-)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12072660/full.md

## Figures

11 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12072660/full.md

## References

51 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12072660/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12072660