# Percentage of Discharged COPD Patients with Exclusion Criteria for Participation in Outpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation

## TL;DR

Many COPD patients discharged after an exacerbation are not eligible for pulmonary rehabilitation due to various exclusion criteria.

## Contribution

This study quantifies the proportion of COPD patients ineligible for pulmonary rehabilitation post-discharge based on clinical criteria.

## Key findings

- Only 39% of COPD patients met eligibility criteria for pulmonary rehabilitation.
- Medical severity and comorbidities were the most common reasons for ineligibility.
- PR uptake remains low even after accounting for ineligibility.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Despite documented benefits across multiple outcome areas, referral and uptake into pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) following discharge after an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is low in many health care systems. Surveys documenting this underutilization may ignore the fact of disease severity or comorbidity severe enough to make many patients ineligible based on accepted selection criteria for the intervention. The aim of this study was to evaluate the magnitude of non-eligibility for PR following discharge after a COPD exacerbation. Methods: Medical records of COPD patients discharged over a one-year period in two hospitals were reviewed. Records from 353 patients discharged home were reviewed by six clinicians with experience in respiratory medicine and/or PR, three at each hospital. Results: The mean age of the total sample was 71 ± 12 years; 53% were female. Full concordance (all three reviewers agreed on the eligibility or non-eligibility of each patient) was 73%. Our eligibility criterion (two of three reviewers agreed) for PR was 39%. Categories (%) of non-eligibility criteria included the severity of medical condition(s) (44%), cognitive problems, psychiatric disease or substance abuse (24%), incorrect diagnosis (18%), institutionalized post-discharge (9%), and language barriers (4%) (patients may have been placed into more than one criteria category). Conclusions: Our study indicates that a majority of patients with clinical diagnoses of COPD discharged following exacerbations may not be appropriate referrals to PR based on accepted inclusion and/or exclusion criteria for the intervention. However, even after taking this into account, PR uptake is still critically underutilized.