# Contrasting cultures of emergency department care: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences of attending the emergency department for low back pain in the UK

## TL;DR

This study explores how patients with low back pain experience different types of care in UK emergency departments, highlighting variations in staff behavior and institutional norms.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel analysis of emergency department cultures using Bourdieu’s concepts of field and habitus to explain patient experiences.

## Key findings

- Three contrasting ED care cultures were identified: emergency screening only, cynicism and neglect, and appropriate and kind care.
- Differences in care delivery were linked to social and institutional norms influencing staff behavior.
- Bourdieu’s theoretical framework helped explain variations in patient experiences based on the ED environment.

## Abstract

This article aimed to explore patients’ experiences of attending the emergency department (ED) for low back pain (LBP) and provides a theoretically informed analysis of the ED cultures perceived by patients to inform their experiences of care.

Multisite, cross-sectional qualitative interview study.

Four NHS Emergency Departments located in the UK.

47 adults (aged 23–79 years) who, in the past 6 weeks, had attended the ED for LBP (all types and durations). Purposive sampling was used to gain variation in the recruiting sites, and participants’ LBP and demographic characteristics.

Data were collected using individual, semistructured, telephone interviews (median 45 min duration) which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was informed using reflexive thematic analysis and ideal type analysis. Cycles of inductive and deductive analysis were undertaken, with Bourdieu’s concepts of field and habitus employed to help explain the findings.

We present three contrasting cultures of ED care for LBP, comprising (1) emergency screening only, (2) ‘cynicism and neglect’ and (3) appropriate and kind care. Taking each culture (field) in turn, we explore important differences in the content and delivery of care. Drawing on Bourdieu’s concepts of field and habitus, we consider the social and institutional norms and misrepresentations likely to underpin the thoughts and behaviours of ED staff (their habitus), and why these tended to vary based on where and by whom the patient was managed in the ED.

Strategies to improve patients’ experience need to review the social and institutional norms that underpin staff habitus, the assumptions informing these norms and the voices that validate and reproduce them.

ISRCTN77522923.