# Effect of dexmedetomidine on the median effective concentration of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in transversus abdominis plane block: an up-down sequential allocation study

**Authors:** Qin Ye, Hongchun Xu, Xiao Liu, Xujiao Wang, Fangjun Wang

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1491849 · Frontiers in Medicine · 2025-04-28

## TL;DR

Adding dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine lowers the effective concentration needed for postoperative pain relief in abdominal nerve blocks.

## Contribution

This study demonstrates that dexmedetomidine reduces the effective concentration of ropivacaine in transversus abdominis plane blocks.

## Key findings

- The EC50 of ropivacaine decreased from 0.207% to 0.165% with dexmedetomidine.
- Quality of recovery scores improved in patients receiving dexmedetomidine.
- No significant adverse reactions were observed with dexmedetomidine use.

## Abstract

This study aimed to observe the effect of dexmedetomidine on the median effective concentration (EC50) of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block.

Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into the RD group and the R group. In the RD group, 40 mL of ropivacaine with 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine was injected into the transverse abdominis plane, while subjects in the R group received equal volumes of ropivacaine with normal saline. When the visual analogue scale (VAS) ≤ 3 within 6 h after surgery, postoperative analgesia was assessed as effective. The probit regression was used to calculate the EC50 and effective concentration in 95% of patients (EC95) of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block. The Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) Score on 24 h after surgery and the incidence of adverse reactions were recorded.

The EC50 of ropivacaine calculated by the probit regression was 0.207% (95% CI, 0.188% ~ 0.228%) in the R group and 0.165% (95% CI, 0.146% ~ 0.182%) in the RD group. The EC95 of ropivacaine was 0.255% (95% CI, 0.230% ~ 0.499%) in the R group and 0.209% (95% CI, 0.187% ~ 0.430%) in the RD group. The score of physical comfort, emotional state, pain, and global score of QoR-40 on 24h after the operation in the RD group was higher than the R group (p=0.036, 0.035, 0.027 and 0.020, respectively). There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups.

Dexmedetomidine as a local anesthetic adjuvant can reduce the EC50 and EC95 of ropivacaine and improve the quality of postoperative recovery of patients with transversus abdominis plane block.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** dexmedetomidine (PubChem CID 5311068), ropivacaine (PubChem CID 71273), normal saline (PubChem CID 5234)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** pain (MESH:D010146)
- **Chemicals:** ropivacaine (MESH:D000077212), Dexmedetomidine (MESH:D020927)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12066523/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12066523/full.md

## References

48 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12066523/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12066523