Correction: Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Two Public Hospitals
Changlin Gong, Maria Teresa Medina Rojas, Maria Gabriela Rubianes Guerrero, Michail Kladas, Arameh Mousakhanian, Aarushi Sudan, Adejoke Johnson, Kimberly Cartmill, Elana Sydney, Donald P. Kotler
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMycobacterium research and diagnosis · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Microscopic Colitis
Correction: Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer (2025) 56:69
10.1007/s12029-025-01187-y
Recently Published the Article “Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Two Public Hospitals 10.1007/s12029-025-01187-y” on Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer. We would like to reach out for 2 issues:
- Correction in DiscussionIn this article, we cited a Danish study on adherence to colonoscopy at the end of Paragraph 4 of Discussion.“Our study revealed that despite these advantages, adherence remains a major obstacle in CRC screening with FIT. Previous studies in the Midwest of the US, California, China, and Denmark also reported a similar colonoscopy adherence rate of 40–50% after a positive FIT [33–36].”The citation 34 is the Danish study:“34. Jørgensen SF, Larsen PT, Erichsen R, Andersen B, Rebolj M, Njor S. Adherence to follow-up and resource use after abnormal FIT-screening: evaluation of the Danish colorectal cancer screening program. Endosc Int Open. 2024;12(5):E649-e658.”The correct statement should be“Previous studies in the Midwest of the US, California, and China also reported a similar colonoscopy adherence rate of 40–50% after a positive FIT.”The citation 34 should also be removed.We sincerely apologize for this mistake. Please kindly let us know if further actions should be taken from our side
- Figure accuracyFigure 1 of the published article did not look like the submitted figure. The lines and boxes are absent and only the texts are present. We uploaded the correct files in both pdf and jpg format.
The original article has been corrected.