Assessing Morbidity and Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Fusion in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yeswanth Akula, Srinath Pammi, Sameer Rathore, Sonu Mehta, Pranshu Agrawal, George W Monaghan, Zhanzhe Zhang, Ajay Asokan, Maheswara Akula

TL;DR
This study reviews the risks and benefits of spinal surgery in elderly patients, finding that while there are some risks, the procedure leads to significant improvements in function and pain.
Contribution
The study provides a comprehensive meta-analysis of outcomes for posterior lumbar fusion in elderly patients, emphasizing functional improvements.
Findings
The pooled mortality rate was 0.7% with a mean operative duration of 181.6 minutes and average blood loss of 337.8 ml.
Significant postoperative improvements were observed in disability and pain scores, with increased JOA scores by 9.9 points.
Complication rates included dural tears (4.3%), neurological deficits (2.2%), metalwork failure (7.06%), and wound dehiscence (3.29%).
Abstract
This review aims to evaluate the morbidity, mortality, and functional outcomes associated with instrumented posterior lumbar arthrodesis in elderly patients aged 65 years and above. A systematic review and meta-analysis adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Cochrane, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL (Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) databases. Relevant studies were identified based on inclusion criteria, with data extraction focusing on mortality rates, operative duration, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complication rates, and clinical and functional outcomes. Functional assessments included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Medical Imaging and Analysis
