# Association Between Pre‐Diagnostic Delay and Survival Among Patients With Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Treated With Curative Intent During the COVID19 Pandemic

**Authors:** Xin Wang, Yvonne Bach, Katherine Lajkosz, Osvaldo Espin‐Garcia, Hiroko Aoyama, Michael Wang, Ronan McLaughlin, Lucy Ma, Carly Barron, Farooq Abdul Rehman, Eric Xueyu Chen, Johnathan Chi‐Wai Yeung, Carol J. Swallow, Savtaj Brar, Rebecca Wong, Aruz Mesci, John Kim, Patrick Veit‐Haibach, Sangeetha Kalimuthu, Raymond Woo‐Jun Jang, Elena Elimova

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70939 · 2025-05-09

## TL;DR

This study found that delays in diagnosing esophageal and gastric cancer during the pandemic did not worsen survival, possibly due to tumor biology being the main factor.

## Contribution

The study is the first to investigate the impact of pre-diagnostic delays on survival during the pandemic for these cancers.

## Key findings

- Prolonged pre-diagnostic interval was not associated with worse overall survival.
- Diagnostic delays increased during the pandemic, with a median increase from 92 to 126 days.
- Tumor biology may be a stronger determinant of prognosis than diagnostic delay.

## Abstract

The majority of esophageal and gastric cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage with poor overall survival (OS). Whether the pre‐diagnostic interval from symptom onset has any impact on OS is unclear. We investigated this question in the peri‐COVID19 pandemic era.

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 308 patients with esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric carcinoma treated with curative intent at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from January 2017 to December 2021. Clinical details pertaining to the initial presentation were determined through a retrospective chart review. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the association between pre‐diagnostic intervals and OS, adjusting for baseline patient characteristics.

The median interval from symptom onset to diagnosis was 98 days (IQR 47–169 days). Using a cox proportional hazard model, prolonged pre‐diagnostic interval was not associated with worse OS (HR 1.00, p = 0.62). Comparing patients diagnosed before and during the COVID19 pandemic, there was a notable increase in diagnostic delay with median pre‐diagnostic interval increasing from 92 to 126 days (p = 0.007). Median age at time of diagnosis was 69.6 during the pandemic vs. 64.7 before the pandemic. Linear regression showed squamous cell histology was significantly associated with increasing time to initial diagnosis (p = 0.04), but this did not hold true in a multivariable model. Looking at other delay metrics, there were no changes in time interval from diagnosis to treatment during versus before the pandemic (median = 1.7 weeks for both), and there was no change in time from diagnosis to resection in those patients who underwent surgery.

The COVID19 pandemic caused significant diagnostic delay for patients presenting with curative gastroesophageal and gastric cancer. The lack of correlation of pre‐diagnostic interval with OS may reflect underlying tumor biology as the driving force that determines prognosis.

The COVID19 pandemic caused significant diagnostic delay for patients presenting with curative gastroesophageal and gastric cancer. The lack of correlation of pre‐diagnostic interval with OS may reflect underlying tumor biology as the driving force that determines prognosis.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** esophageal cancer (MONDO:0007576), gastric cancer (MONDO:0001056), COVID19 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Esophageal and Gastric Cancer (MESH:D013274), Cancer (MESH:D009369), COVID19 (MESH:D000086382)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12062865/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12062865