Impact of stocking densities on growth, organ index, serum biochemistry, gut morphology and microbiota of young ducks in a rice-duck-crayfish coculture system
Xiao Long He, Zhen Hua Liang, Ze Heng Huang, Lian Bing Qi, Yan Wu, Jia Liu, Tao Huang, Jing Bo Liu, Jin Song Pi, Hao Zhang

TL;DR
This study examines how different stocking densities affect the health and gut microbiota of young ducks in a rice-duck-crayfish coculture system.
Contribution
The study identifies specific changes in duck organ indices, serum biochemistry, and gut microbiota under varying stocking densities in an RDC system.
Findings
High-density stocking increased liver and spleen indices and altered serum biochemistry in ducks.
Increased stocking density led to gut morphology changes and shifts in cecal microbiota composition.
High stocking density reduced beneficial gut bacteria and increased harmful bacteria abundance.
Abstract
The rice-duck-crayfish (RDC) coculture system, an ecologically efficient breeding strategy that accommodates natural behavior of ducks and improves their welfare. The optimal stocking density and its impact on duck health in this system remains undetermined. The study examined the impact of stocking densities on growth, organ index, serum biochemistry, gut morphology and microbiota of ducks in RDC system. A total of five hundred and forty 20-day-old Nonghu No. 2 ducks were randomly allocated based on density: low-density (LD; 8 birds/666.67 m2), medium-density (MD; 12 birds/666.67 m2) and high-density (HD; 16 birds/666.67 m2) groups, with three replicates in each group, and the symbiosis period was up to 40 days until rice tasselling. There were no significant differences in final body weight, average daily gain, or feed:gain ratio between groups (p>0.05); however, the liver and…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAgricultural Systems and Practices
