# Testing Theory-Enhanced Messaging to Promote COVID-19 Vaccination: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

**Authors:** Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Yanhan Shen, Sasha Fleary, McKaylee Robertson, Josefina Nunez, Kate Penrose, Jenna Sanborn, Surabhi Yadav, Avantika Srivastava, Denis Nash, Angela Parcesepe

PMC · DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6472442/v1 · Research Square · 2025-05-02

## TL;DR

This study tested new messaging strategies to increase uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine but found no significant improvement compared to standard public health messages.

## Contribution

The paper introduces and evaluates two theory-based messaging interventions for promoting vaccination in a randomized controlled trial.

## Key findings

- No meaningful differences in vaccine uptake were observed between the three messaging groups.
- Participants showed low vaccine uptake across all intervention and control groups.
- Theory-enhanced messaging strategies did not significantly increase vaccine willingness or uptake.

## Abstract

Uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine has been low in the US (~ 22% among adults in 2023 − 241) despite ongoing public health recommendations. This has been linked to many factors including pandemic fatigue, reduced risk perception, dis/misinformation, and recently, symptoms of depression and anxiety. Novel communication and messaging strategies are one potential approach to promote vaccine uptake. This randomized control trial tests two communication-based approaches compared to standard public health messaging on vaccine uptake in a cohort of adult US residents. We completed a 3-arm, parallel-group, assessor-blinded stratified-randomized trial between April-15–2024 and May-2–2024. Eligible individuals were ≥ 18 years old who: 1)had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, but, 2)had not received COVID-19 vaccine doses since September-11–2023, and 3)had not been infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the past three months. We purposively sampled eligible individuals with and without symptoms of anxiety and depression. Participants were randomly allocated to: 1) attitudinal inoculation intervention; 2) CBT-kernels intervention; or 3) standard public health messaging intervention. At four-week follow up, these groups showed no meaningful differences in uptake (CBT- kernels:1.6% [95%CI:0.4–2.8]; Inoculation:0.9% [95%CI:0.0–1.8]; and Standard:1.3% [95%CI:0.3–2.4]) or level of vaccine willingness. Successful efforts to increase uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine via theory-enhanced messaging remain elusive.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MONDO:0100096), anxiety (MONDO:0005618), depression (MONDO:0002050), SARS-CoV-2 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** anxiety (MESH:D001007), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), depression (MESH:D003866), fatigue (MESH:D005221), infected (MESH:D007239)
- **Species:** Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (no rank) [taxon 2697049], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12060965/full.md

## References

43 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12060965/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12060965