Complete genome sequence of two Hominenteromicrobium mulieris strains CIP 112194 and CIP 112527, isolated from a human fecal sample
Gérald Touak, Damien Rei, Dominique Clermont, Christiane Bouchier

TL;DR
This paper presents the complete genome sequences of two Hominenteromicrobium mulieris strains from a human fecal sample.
Contribution
The study provides the first complete genome sequences of Hominenteromicrobium mulieris strains isolated from a human gut.
Findings
Two Hominenteromicrobium mulieris strains were isolated from a healthy adult's feces.
The complete genome sequences of these strains were determined.
The strains were isolated using anaerobic flow cytometry sorting.
Abstract
The human gut microbiota is dominated by obligately anaerobic bacteria. A method based on species-targeted sorting using flow cytometry under anaerobic conditions has been performed to analyze the gut microbiome. This report describes the complete genome sequences of two Hominenteromicrobium mulieris strains CIP 112194 and CIP 112527 that were isolated from the feces of a healthy adult from France. This volunteer is a young adult having a vegetarian diet.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Feature | Data per strain | |
|---|---|---|
| CIP 112194 | CIP 112527 | |
| Sequencing statistics | ||
| Number of filtered ONT reads | 41,843 | 11,389 |
| Filtered ONT read N50 | 8,351 | 15,403 |
| Genome statistics | ||
| Genome size (bp) | 3,146,805 | 3,184,959 |
| GC content (%) | 52.4 | 52.41 |
| No. of tRNAs | 57 | 57 |
| No. of rRNAs | 6 | 6 |
| Average coverage (×) | 108 | 54 |
| Average coverage (×) | 284 | 461 |
| No. of CDSs | 3,030 | 3,088 |
| Accession no. |
|
|
| Sequence read archive accession | ||
| Filtered ONT reads |
|
|
| Illumina paired-end reads |
|
|
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGut microbiota and health · Fecal contamination and water quality · Infections and bacterial resistance
ANNOUNCEMENT
To study microbial communities, Afrizal et al. (1) developed an application of single-cell dispensing, which allows label-free sorting of microscopic particles. Based on this approach, 82 human gut bacterial strains have been characterized, including novel species such as Hominenteromicrobium mulieris (1). We report here the complete genome sequences of two strains of H. mulieris CIP 112194 and CIP 112527 isolated from human feces belonging to the ancillary cohort “COSIMMGEN J” initiated for the study and approved by the COMITE DE PROTECTION DES PERSONNES Ile de France 1 - DOSSIER: 2018-fév. -14819. These strains were isolated from a healthy volunteer’s fecal sample, targeted by two polyclonal antibodies against two Faecalibacterium prausnitzii phylogroups and sorted using flow cytometry under anaerobic conditions (2). They were grown in pre-reduced tryptone, peptone, glucose yeast extract medium (supplemented with 0.1% l-cysteine–HCl and vitamins) (3) 48 h at 37°C and under strict anaerobic conditions (5% H_2_/5% CO_2_/90% N_2_). Further analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequencing assigned the isolates to Hominenteromicrobium genus, which belongs to the Oscillospiraceae family along with F. prausnitzii.
Genomic DNA used for Illumina and Nanopore sequencing was extracted from an 8 mL overnight culture of the strains CIP 112194 and CIP 112527. Genomic-tip 100G kit (Qiagen) and Nanobind CBB kit (Pacific Biosciences) were used for CIP 112194 and CIP 112527, respectively. Illumina sequencing was performed by the Mutualized Platform for Microbiology (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) following their standard workflow for library preparation (Nextera tagmentation kit, Illumina) and an Illumina NextSeq 550 device using a 2 × 150 bp protocol. Paired-end reads were trimmed using fqCleanerER v23.12 workflow with a Phred quality score of 25 and read length >= 100 bases (4). The same gDNA aliquots were also used for long-read sequencing using the ligation sequencing gDNA kit (SQK-NBD114.24, Oxford Nanopore Technologies). gDNAs were not sheared or size selected to perform libraries. Libraries were sequenced on a MinION Mk1C device for 48 h (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK) with R10.4 flow cell (FLO-MIN114, Oxford Nanopore Technologies). The Dorado v0.3.0 tool was used to perform base calling. A command-line tool Hybracter hybrid v0.7.3 has been used for de novo assembly method (5). Long reads are filtered and subsampled using Filtlong v0.2.1 with parameter “--min_quality 10 min_length 10000” for CIP 112527 and “--min_quality 10 min_length 5000” for CIP 112194. This retained 11,389 reads (175,875,634 bp with an N50 of 15,403 bp) and 41,843 reads (345,761,802 bp with an N50 of 8,351 bp) for CIP 112527 and CIP 112194, respectively. Genome assemblies were generated using Flye v2.9 yielding a single contig, marked as circular by Flye, for each strain. The contigs were finally polished using Illumina-trimmed paired-end reads with pypolca v0.3.1 for CIP 112194 and polypolish v0.6.0 for CIP 112527 (6). The contigs were reoriented to begin by the dnaA chromosomal replication initiator gene using dnaapler v0.7.0 (7).
Both genome assemblies consist of a single circular chromosome with a length of ~3,1 Mbp and a G+C content of 52.4% (Table 1). More information is shown in Table 1. A pairwise genome comparison between the draft genome of H. mulieris type strain CLA-AAH250 (GCF_020687165) and genome sequences of CIP 112194 and CIP 112527 reported an average nucleotide identity based on MUMmer of 98.88% (with 85.37% aligned nucleotides) and 98.98% (with 84.03% aligned nucleotides), respectively, (8) indicating that the two strains belong to Hominenteromicrobium mulieris species.
The annotation of the genomes was performed using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (version 6.7, March 2024).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Afrizal A, Hitch TCA, Viehof A, Treichel N, Riedel T, Abt B, Buhl EM, Kohlheyer D, Overmann J, Clavel T. 2022. Anaerobic single-cell dispensing facilitates the cultivation of human gut bacteria. Environ Microbiol 24:3861–3881. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.1593535233904 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Bellais S, Nehlich M, Ania M, Duquenoy A, Mazier W, van den Engh G, Baijer J, Treichel NS, Clavel T, Belotserkovsky I, Thomas V. 2022. Species-targeted sorting and cultivation of commensal bacteria from the gut microbiome using flow cytometry under anaerobic conditions. Microbiome 10:24. doi:10.1186/s 40168-021-01206-735115054 PMC 8812257 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Le Gratiet T, Poezevara T, Rouxel S, Houard E, Mazuet C, Chemaly M, Maréchal CL. 2020. Development of an innovative and quick method for the isolation of Clostridium botulinum strains involved in avian botulism outbreaks. Toxins (Basel) 12:42. doi:10.3390/toxins 1201004231936866 PMC 7020472 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Alexis CRISCUOLO. 2021. fq Clean ER. Available from: https://gitlab.pasteur.fr/GI Phy/fq Clean ER
- 5Bouras G, Houtak G, Wick RR, Mallawaarachchi V, Roach MJ, Papudeshi B, Judd LM, Sheppard AE, Edwards RA, Vreugde S. 2024. Hybracter: enabling scalable, automated, complete and accurate bacterial genome assemblies. Microb Genom 10:001244. doi:10.1099/mgen.0.00124438717808 PMC 11165638 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Bouras G, Judd LM, Edwards RA, Vreugde S, Stinear TP, Wick RR. 2024. How low can you go? Short-read polishing of Oxford Nanopore bacterial genome assemblies. Microb Genom 10:001254. doi:10.1099/mgen.0.00125438833287 PMC 11261834 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Bouras G, Grigson SR, Papudeshi B, Mallawaarachchi V, Roach MJ. 2024. Dnaapler: a tool to reorient circular microbial genomes. JOSS 9:5968. doi:10.21105/joss.05968 · doi ↗
- 8Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. 2016. J Species WS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32:929–931. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv 68126576653 PMC 5939971 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
