Complete genome sequences of nine isolates from microplastics in the Bow River, Calgary, Canada
Kira L. Goff, Sneha Suresh, Jonas M. Stadfeld, Srijak Bhatnagar

TL;DR
This paper reports the full genomes of nine bacteria found on microplastics in a Canadian river, offering insights into their potential to break down plastic.
Contribution
The study provides complete genome sequences of nine bacterial isolates from microplastics in the Bow River, revealing their biodegradation potential.
Findings
Nine bacterial strains were isolated from microplastics in the Bow River.
The complete genome sequences of these isolates were determined.
The isolates may contribute to understanding plastic biodegradation in freshwater environments.
Abstract
We present the complete genome sequences of nine bacterial strains isolated from microplastics from water or sediments of the Bow River in Calgary, Alberta. These isolates provide insight into the freshwater microplastic microbiome and their plastic biodegradation potential.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Isolate ID | LS1 | LW8 | RS5 | RS7 | RS8 | RS10 | RS11 | RW6 | RW9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culture media | LB | LB | R2A | R2A | R2A | R2A | R2A | R2A | R2A |
| Classification |
|
| |||||||
| Genome size (bp) | 4,761,317 | 5,952,450 | 5,165,228 | 5,809,518 | 7,333,835 | 5,165,155 | 4,918,501 | 3,939,831 | 4,537,953 |
| Status | Complete | Complete | Complete | Complete | Complete | Complete | Complete | Complete | Complete |
| Genome coverage | 47× | 21× | 46× | 22× | 28× | 52× | 59× | 182× | 78× |
| Number of reads | 37,364 | 15,924 | 23,584 | 75,412 | 115,168 | 27,450 | 63,631 | 81,173 | 117,616 |
| N50 reads (bp) | 18,682 | 20,361 | 18,511 | 10,091 | 4,146 | 18,060 | 14,863 | 19,989 | 8,298 |
| GC% | 37.6 | 60.0 | 37.1 | 39.8 | 43.6 | 37.1 | 37.0 | 38.8 | 66.1 |
| No. of sequences | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
| CDS | 4,602 | 5,277 | 4,900 | 5,508 | 6,547 | 4,995 | 4,779 | 3,651 | 4,049 |
| tRNA | 107 | 70 | 109 | 83 | 88 | 109 | 119 | 73 | 72 |
| CRISPR repeats | 1 | 2 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 13 | 0 | 8 |
| Plastic degradation genes | PHA depolymerase, lipase, esterase | Oxr1 Oxidoreductase | Phthalate dioxygenase reductase | PHA depolymerase, PHB depolymerase | |||||
| Hydrocarbon degradation genes | LadA | AlkB ( | |||||||
| GenBank accession |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| SRA accession |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
ANNOUNCEMENT
Microplastics are pervasive contaminants in environments throughout the globe, serving as hosts for microbial communities distinct from those in the surrounding environment (1). Here, we present genomes of bacteria isolated from microplastics in the Bow River, after the confluence with Nose Creek and Elbow River, within Calgary, Canada’s fourth largest city.
Microplastics were isolated from water (40 L) and sediment samples (0.5 Kg) (51.04344 °N, 114.01502 °W) through 20 µm filtration or CaCl_2_ density separation (1.4 Kg/L), respectively, followed by Nile red staining (2). Microplastics were rinsed twice with 1× PBS buffer and inoculated in either liquid LB (3) or R2A media (4) at room temperature (22°C). Upon visible growth (2–3 days), a 10^−4^ dilution of the liquid culture was spread-plated on the respective solid media (LB or R2A with 1.5% agar at room temperature), followed by 4–5 rounds of streaking to achieve isolation. One colony from each isolate was grown in respective liquid media for 48 hours and used for high-molecular-weight DNA extraction using the Lucigen MasterPure Complete DNA & RNA Purification Kit (Mandel Scientific) using the manufacturer-supplied protocol for Gram-positive bacteria. DNA (no shearing or size selection) was sequenced on an R10.4.1 Nanopore MinION flowcell using Native Barcoding Kit 24 (SQK-NBD114.24, Oxford Nanopore) and basecalled using Dorado (v7.3.11, [email protected] model).
Technical sequences, such as Nanopore adaptors and low-quality reads (≤1,000 bp, Q ≤10), were removed by Porechop ABI (v0.50, ABI mode) (5) and Chopper (v0.80) (6), respectively. Genomes were assembled with Flye (v2.9.3; nano-hq mode) (7) and polished with Medaka (v1.11.3). Genome completeness and contamination were calculated using CheckM2 (v1.0.1) (8). Genomes with ≥99.90% ANI were dereplicated using OrthoANIu (9) and annotated using NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP, version 6.7) (10), and CRISPR regions were identified using CRISPR-CasFinder (subtype clustering model) (11). Taxonomy was assigned using GTDB-Tk (v2.4.0 with release 220 database) (12).
The nine isolate genomes with fully circularized chromosomes, determined by the Flye assembler, ranged in size from 3,939,831 to 7,333,835 base pairs, encoding 3,610 to 6,553 coding sequences (CDS) and 72 to 118 tRNAs (Table 1). Extrachromosomal elements (ECEs) were present in four genomes, with the RS8 genome containing six ECEs. Among the isolates, Lysinibacillus, Peribacillus, and Paenibacillus are gram-positive, while Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, and Acinetobacter are gram-negative.
As these bacteria were isolated from microplastics, genomes were searched for plastic degradation genes using BLAST against PlasticDB and the Plastic Microbial Biodegradation Database (13, 14). Four genomes had hits for plastic-degrading genes (>80% identity). Isolate LW8 and RW9 have a gene for polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) depolymerase that can degrade poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), polycaprolactone, polyethersulfone, polyhydroxyalkanoate, and polylactic acid. RW9 also has a polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) depolymerase gene involved in the biodegradation of polyhydroxybutyrate. RS7 and RW6 contained genes for polyurethane and phthalate biodegradation, respectively. Some plastics are hydrocarbon derivatives and can be degraded through hydrocarbon degradation pathways (15, 16). Hence, the genomes were searched for hydrocarbon metabolism markers using CANT-HYD (17). LW8 and RW6 contained long-chain alkane monooxygenase (LadA), with the latter containing two other alkane metabolism genes (AlkB and AlmA).
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Zettler ER, Mincer TJ, Amaral-Zettler LA. 2013. Life in the “plastisphere”: microbial communities on plastic marine debris. Environ Sci Technol 47:7137–7146. doi:10.1021/es 401288 x 23745679 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Stadfeld J, Suresh S, Bhatnagar S. 2024. Non-destructive microplastic isolation from water and sediment samples v 1. Protocols.io. doi:10.17504/protocols.io.4r 3l 2q 264l 1y/v 1 · doi ↗
- 3Bertani G. 1951. Studies on lysogenesis I. J Bacteriol 62:293–300. doi:10.1128/jb.62.3.293-300.195114888646 PMC 386127 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Reasoner DJ, Geldreich EE. 1985. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1–7. doi:10.1128/aem.49.1.1-7.19853883894 PMC 238333 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Bonenfant Q, Noé L, Touzet H. 2023. Porechop_ABI: discovering unknown adapters in Oxford Nanopore Technology sequencing reads for downstream trimming. Bioinform Adv 3:vbac 085. doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbac 08536698762 PMC 9869717 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6De Coster W, Rademakers R. 2023. Nano Pack 2: population-scale evaluation of long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 39:btad 311. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad 31137171891 PMC 10196664 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi:10.1038/s 41587-019-0072-830936562 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Chklovski A, Parks DH, Woodcroft BJ, Tyson GW. 2024. Author correction: check M 2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nat Methods 20:1203–1212. doi:10.1038/s 41592-023-01940-w 37500759 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
