# Effect of Thinning on Tree Differentiation, Productivity and Carbon Stocks of Cryptomeria japonica Plantations

## TL;DR

This study examines how thinning affects tree size, productivity, and carbon storage in Cryptomeria japonica plantations over six years.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into how varying thinning intensities influence tree differentiation and carbon stocks in monoculture plantations.

## Key findings

- Higher thinning intensities (T2 and T3) increased large-diameter timber production and reduced self-thinning.
- Stand productivity decreased then increased with stand age, with the greatest change in the highest thinning treatment (T3).
- Carbon stocks in individual trees increased with time and were more pronounced at higher thinning intensities.

## Abstract

Stand structure affects tree efficiency for a competitive use of resources and largely determines stand productivity and carbon stocks. Consequently, research on individual size and differentiation of stand structures is critical for improving monoculture‐stand productivity and carbon stock. Here, we studied the effects of four thinning intensities (CK: 0%, T1: 20%, T2: 30%, and T3: 40%) in an experimental plantation of
Cryptomeria japonica
var. sinensis, and assessed the individual differentiation characteristics, diameter class‐frequency distribution, stand productivity, and carbon stocks over 6 years. The results showed that the Gini coefficient decreased with increasing thinning intensity and stand age. Self‐thinning of the
C. japonica
stands occurred even after thinning, and the self‐thinning rate was relatively high at the age of 10–13 years. For T2 and T3 treatments, the self‐thinning did not occur in the 6th year after thinning. The mean diameter of each treatment increased with increasing stand age, and the normal distribution curve of diameter class frequency gradually shifted to the right, with small changes in the CK treatment and the larger one in treatment T3. Thinning increased the large‐diameter (DBH ≥ 26 cm) timber, especially in T2 and T3 treatments. Stand volume and productivity varied with stand age, with the greatest change in stand volume observed in T3, followed by that in the CK treatment. Stand productivity at different thinning intensities generally decreased and then increased with increasing stand age. Although the carbon stock of individual trees and stand increased with time, the individual trees appeared to have an obviously increasing trend with increasing thinning intensity. The results provided important insights into the implications of designing thinning intensity and timing, and determining the tree‐size class removal to meet specific management objectives.

Tree size differentiation, stand productivity and carbon stock of thinning were explored: The Gini coefficient decreased with increasing thinning intensity and stand age. Self‐thinning was relatively high when stands were 10–13 years old but did not occur in the 6th year after thinning in treatments T2 and T3. Higher thinning intensities had the higher frequency of large‐diameter (DBH ≥ 26 cm) timber. Stand productivity at different thinning intensities generally decreased and then increased with increasing stand age. The carbon stock of individual trees increases with time, with a clear increase occurring with increasing thinning intensity.