CLEFT-Q SwePsych protocol: A prospective observational study to investigate the psychometric characteristics test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability of CLEFT-Q

TL;DR

This study evaluates the reliability and effectiveness of the CLEFT-Q questionnaire for measuring quality of life in cleft lip and palate patients.

Contribution

The study introduces a protocol to assess the psychometric properties of CLEFT-Q, including test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability.

Findings

Test-retest reliability will be evaluated using repeated data collection from 50 patients.

Responsiveness will be tested by comparing pre- and post-surgery scores in patients.

Interpretability will be analyzed using anchor-based and distribution-based methods.

Abstract

Patient perceived benefit of treatment for cleft lip and/or palate is of great importance since it is central to development of cleft care. CLEFT-Q is a cleft-specific questionnaire on health-related quality of life. Test-retest reliability, aspects of responsiveness and interpretability are yet to be established for CLEFT-Q. This study aims to investigate these psychometric characteristics of CLEFT-Q.

To establish the test-retest reliability of CLEFT-Q, data will be collected repeatedly and independently at approximately 1-week intervals. Inclusion of approximately 50 patients is considered adequate for a test-retest study. To improve the interpretability of CLEFT-Q norm data from a control population of volunteers without a cleft will be collected. A total of approximately 210 participants will be included from schools, high-schools and universities. To test the responsiveness of CLEFT-Q, patients will answer selected subscales of CLEFT-Q, longitudinal anchor questions and perform global ratings of change before and after surgery. To ensure robust results, approximately 50 patients for each type of treatment will be recruited. If CLEFT-Q is found to be responsive, the pre- and postoperative difference in scores of CLEFT-Q will be compared with the change in objective measurements based on assessments by professionals in cleft care obtained in this study. To evaluate interpretability, results will be analysed to investigate the minimal important change using anchor-based, distribution-based and qualitative approach.

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the ID 2021-06993-01.

Figures