# Effectiveness over time of a primary series of the original monovalent COVID-19 vaccines in adults in the United States

**Authors:** J. Bradley Layton, Patricia C. Lloyd, Lauren S. Peetluk, Yixin Jiao, Djeneba Audrey Djibo, Joann F. Gruber, Jie Deng, Christine Bui, An-Chi Lo, Rachel P. Ogilvie, Ron Parambi, Michael Miller, Jennifer Song, Lisa B. Weatherby, Sylvia Cho, Hui Lee Wong, Tainya C. Clarke, Jessica Rose Hervol, Dóra Illei, Elizabeth J. Bell, Grace Wenya Yang, John D. Seeger, Michael Wernecke, Morgan M. Richey, Richard A. Forshee, Steven A. Anderson, Yoganand Chillarige, Cheryl N. McMahill-Walraven, Kandace L. Amend, Mary S. Anthony, Azadeh Shoaibi

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320434 · PLOS One · 2025-05-06

## TL;DR

This study analyzed how well three original monovalent COVID-19 vaccines worked over time in U.S. adults, finding that effectiveness varied by vaccine type and diagnosis severity.

## Contribution

The study provides real-world evidence on the time-specific effectiveness of three monovalent vaccines against medically and hospital-diagnosed COVID-19 in U.S. adults.

## Key findings

- Vaccine effectiveness was highest for mRNA-1273 (84%) compared to BNT162b2 (77%) and JNJ-7836735 (66%) against hospital/ED-diagnosed cases.
- Effectiveness lasted up to 9 months for hospital/ED-diagnosed cases and about 7 months for medically diagnosed cases.
- Vaccine effectiveness varied by brand and was influenced by the predominant variant era.

## Abstract

With data from 2 US claims databases (Optum, CVS Health) supplemented with Immunization Information System COVID-19 vaccine records, we evaluated overall and time-specific vaccine effectiveness (VE) of an initial primary series for 3 monovalent COVID-19 vaccines—BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and JNJ-7836735—in adults (18-64 years). Vaccinated individuals were matched to unvaccinated comparators, and we estimated VE against any medically diagnosed COVID-19 and hospital/emergency department (ED)-diagnosed COVID-19. Additionally, we estimated VE by era of predominant variants, in subgroups, and compared across vaccine brands. The cohorts consisted of 341,097 (Optum) and 1,151,775 (CVS Health) matched pairs for BNT162b2; 201,604 (Optum) and 651,545 (CVS Health) for mRNA-1273; and 49,285 (Optum) and 149,813 (CVS Health) for JNJ-7836735. The study period began 11 December 2020 (date of first COVID-19 vaccine availability in the US) and ended 15 January 2022 in Optum and 31 March 2022 in CVS Health. Summary VE estimates from meta-analysis against hospital/ED-diagnosed COVID-19 were: BNT162b2, 77% (95% CI, 76%-78%); mRNA-1273, 84% (95% CI, 83%-85%), JNJ-7836735 66% (95% CI, 63%-68%). VE estimates were higher for hospital/ED-diagnosed COVID-19 than for medically diagnosed COVID-19, and VE estimates were highest in adults receiving mRNA-1273 for both outcomes. VE was sustained for approximately 7 months for medically diagnosed and up to 9 months for hospital/ED-diagnosed COVID-19. VE differed by brand and variant era. Ongoing real-world surveillance of COVID-19 vaccines using robust data sources and methodology is needed as new variants and recommendations for updated vaccines have evolved.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12054878/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12054878/full.md

## References

53 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12054878/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12054878