# Multiomics comparative analysis of feces AMRGs of Duroc pigs and Tibetan and the effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on AMRGs upon antibiotic exposure

**Authors:** Tao Wang, Yuheng Luo, Xiangfeng Kong, Ling Fang, Liping Zhu, Bing Yu, Ping Zheng, Zhiqing Huang, Xiangbing Mao, Yu Jie, Junqiu Luo, Hui Yan, Jun He

PMC · DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01983-24 · Microbiology Spectrum · 2024-11-29

## TL;DR

This study compares AMRGs in the feces of Duroc and Tibetan pigs and finds that Tibetan pig fecal microbiota can reduce AMRGs in piglets after antibiotic exposure.

## Contribution

First comprehensive analysis of AMRG expression in Tibetan and Duroc pig feces using metagenomic and metatranscriptomic methods.

## Key findings

- Duroc pigs have significantly higher genomic AMRG abundance than Tibetan pigs.
- Tibetan pig fecal microbiota reduces AMRG excretion in DLY piglets after antibiotic exposure.
- Bacteroidota phylum plays a key role in AMRG reduction by Tibetan pig microbiota.

## Abstract

Fecal matter is recognized as both a reservoir and a transmission source for various antimicrobial resistance genes (AMRGs). However, the transcriptional activity of AMRGs in swine feces is not well understood. In addition, the effect of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) on the excretion of AMRGs has rarely been reported. Our study explored the diversity, abundance, transcriptional activity, and bacterial hosts of AMRGs in Tibetan and Duroc pig feces using metagenomic and metatranscriptomic sequencing technologies. We discovered a significantly higher genomic abundance of AMRGs in the feces of Duroc pigs compared to Tibetan pigs (P < 0.001), although the transcript levels did not show a significant difference. The results showed that the core composition of AMRGs in pig feces varied considerably, with the most transcriptionally active AMRGs being oqxB, tetQ, Bla1, dfrA1, and amrB. Furthermore, the Firmicutes phylum is the main host of AMRGs. By transplanting fecal flora from Tibetan and Duroc pigs into the intestines of Duroc Landrace Yorkshire (DLY) piglets after acute antibiotic exposure, we found that only Tibetan pig fecal flora significantly reduced AMRGs in the feces of DLY piglets (P < 0.05). The effectiveness of Tibetan pig fecal microorganisms in removing AMRGs from DLY pig feces was mainly influenced by microbial communities, especially the Bacteroidota phylum. These findings offer valuable insights for the prevention and control of AMRG pollution.

To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first comprehensive analysis of antimicrobial resistance gene (AMRGs) expression in the fecal microbiota of Tibetan and Duroc pigs, employing an integrated metagenomic and metatranscriptomic approach. Our findings indicate a higher risk of AMRGs transmission in the feces of Duroc pigs compared to Tibetan pigs. Given the escalating antimicrobial resistance crisis, novel therapeutic interventions are imperative to mitigate gut colonization by pathogens and AMRGs. In this regard, we investigated the impact of fecal microbiota from Tibetan and Duroc pig sources on AMRGs excretion in Duroc Landrace Yorkshire (DLY) piglets’ feces following acute antibiotic exposure. Remarkably, only fecal microbiota sourced from Tibetan pigs exhibited a reduction in AMRGs excretion in DLY piglets’ feces. This underscores the significance of evaluating the presence of AMRGs within donor fecal microbiota for effective AMRGs decolonization strategies.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** oqxB (multidrug efflux RND transporter permease subunit OqxB) [NCBI Gene 23847048], tet(Q) (tetracycline resistance ribosomal protection protein Tet(Q)) [NCBI Gene 26158278], Blai1 (proviral insertion Bla 1) [NCBI Gene 104342], dfrA1 (trimethoprim-resistant dihydrofolate reductase DfrA1) [NCBI Gene 57334187], amrB (AmmeMemoRadiSam system protein B) [NCBI Gene 1446230]

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** AMRG (-)
- **Species:** Sus scrofa (pig, species) [taxon 9823]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12054024/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12054024/full.md

## References

58 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12054024/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12054024