Validation of A Nationwide Digital Pediatric Pathology Consultation Network
Haiying Chen, Juan Putra, Anita Nagy, Jefferson Terry, Dina El Demellawy, Joseph de Nanassy, Erica Schollenberg, Aaron Haig, Camelia Stefanovici, Kathryn Whelan, Alysa Poulin, Dorothee Dal Soglio, Zesheng Chen, Brian Smith, Cindy Fiore, Gino R. Somers

TL;DR
A nationwide digital pathology consultation network for pediatric cancer cases in Canada was validated with high diagnostic concordance.
Contribution
This study presents a unique validation of a large digital pediatric pathology network using real-world clinical processes.
Findings
269 diagnostic data points were generated with 95.5% concordance between digital and glass slide diagnoses.
The validation exceeded the College of American Pathologists' 95% concordance recommendation.
The network was successfully validated with participation from all hospitals and pathologists in the network.
Abstract
Digital pathology facilitates remote pathology consultations. Pediatric pathologists in Canada formed a nationwide digital pathology consultation network, mostly for second opinion review of pediatric cancer cases. Validation of such a large network for clinical use is challenging. Here we report our unique validation process of this digital pathology network. This study was designed in keeping with the College of American Pathologist (CAP) guidelines, and included 14 pathologists from 9 hospitals across Canada. All cases are pediatric pathology cases. Each pathologist reviewed multiple digital cases and the corresponding glass slide cases. For each review, intra-observer concordance (diagnosis on digital case versus diagnosis on glass slide case) was recorded, creating a data point. The study generated 269 valid diagnostic data points. Out of the 269 data points, 257 were concordant…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElectronic Health Records Systems · Healthcare Systems and Technology · Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
