Surgery for epiretinal membrane using three different surgical platforms: A comparative pilot study

TL;DR

This study compares three surgical methods for removing epiretinal membranes, finding that two newer technologies can achieve good results without using dye, though they don't outperform traditional methods in long-term outcomes.

Contribution

The study introduces and compares two new surgical platforms (Mi-OCT and 3D-HUD) for epiretinal membrane peeling without staining.

Findings

Mi-OCT and 3D-HUD achieved complete ERM removal in 80% and 70% of cases without dye.

Surgical and peeling times were significantly shorter with Mi-OCT and 3D-HUD compared to conventional methods.

Visual acuity improved in all groups, with no significant differences between them at three months.

Abstract

To compare dye-assisted epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling using a standard operating microscope (SOM) with peeling without staining using either microscope-integrated optical coherence tomography (Mi-OCT) or a three-dimensional heads-up display (3D-HUD) platform.

A prospective, randomized, and interventional pilot study. Patients requiring surgical intervention for ERM were randomized into group A (Mi-OCT), group B (3D-HUD), where dye was not used, and group C (dye-assisted peeling using SOM). Primary outcomes included the percentage of the eyes where complete ERM removal was possible without staining in groups A and B, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes included total surgical and ERM peel time.

Complete ERM peeling was possible only in 80% (group A) and 70% (group B) without using dye. Postoperatively, no ERM recurrence was observed in groups A and B, except for one (10%) in group C. BCVA at 3 months improved significantly from baseline in all. The mean surgical and ERM peel time was considerably lesser in groups A and B than in group C.

Mi-OCT and 3D-HUD ensured complete ERM removal in 80% and 70% of cases, respectively, without dye, compared to 100% in the conventional group, with one recurrence. Both technologies reduced surgical and peeling time. Intraoperative OCT improved visualization and minimized unnecessary maneuvers, aligning with PIONEER and DISCOVER studies. BCVA improved significantly at three months across all groups, with no intergroup differences. Despite benefits, high costs and a learning curve limit widespread adoption. Our study’s small sample size and short follow-up warrant further research to validate findings and assess long-term outcomes, including potential dye-related toxicity in conventional techniques.

Mi-OCT and 3D-HUD were associated with shorter surgical times and less need for staining. However, they had no added advantage over SOM at the three-month follow-up.

Figures