# Validating a Reading Comprehension Assessment for College Students: Preliminary Findings

## TL;DR

This study validates a new reading comprehension test for college students called MOCCA-College, showing how it connects to background knowledge and reading efficiency.

## Contribution

The study introduces and validates MOCCA-College, a novel assessment for college-level reading comprehension.

## Key findings

- Correct answers on MOCCA-College are linked to meaningful background knowledge connections.
- Incorrect answers are associated with irrelevant background knowledge.
- MOCCA-College efficiency correlates with standardized reading tests like NDRT and TOWRE-2.

## Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate a novel reading comprehension assessment for college students named MOCCA-College. A random sample of college students (N = 63, average age of 22.5) were recruited from various education programs (e.g., first-year courses, TRIO, SONA) and completed MOCCA-College Online and were later recruited to complete face-to-face think-aloud and recall tasks, as well as standardized assessments such as the Nelson-Denny Reading Test (NDRT) and the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE-2). Based on the think-aloud findings, correct answers on MOCCA-College were associated with meaningful connections to background knowledge. Incorrect answers were associated with irrelevant connections to background knowledge that are not helpful for comprehension. Moreover, efficiency on MOCCA-College (seconds per correct answer) demonstrated criterion validity based on the NDRT and TOWRE-2. Future research and analyses may examine assessment development, particularly for identifying nuanced individual differences in college readers’ comprehension.