# 1p and/or 19q polysomy is an adverse prognostic factor in oligodendrogliomas, and easy to detect by automated FISH

**Authors:** Karine Michaud, Peter Vincent Gould, Myreille D’Astous, Claudie Paquet, Stephan Saikali

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322809 · PLOS One · 2025-05-02

## TL;DR

This study shows that automated FISH analysis can easily detect 1p and/or 19q polysomy in brain tumors called oligodendrogliomas, which is linked to worse patient outcomes.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates that automated FISH is a reliable and efficient method for detecting 1p/19q polysomy, which has clinical prognostic value in oligodendrogliomas.

## Key findings

- 1p and/or 19q polysomy was found in 40% of oligodendroglioma cases and was more common in high-grade and recurrent tumors.
- Polysomy was strongly associated with shorter event-free and overall survival in patients.
- Automated FISH analysis showed high concordance with manual analysis and can be easily integrated into existing platforms.

## Abstract

To study the feasibility of automated analysis by FISH technique in the determination of the 1p and/or 19q polysomy in oligodendrogliomas (OGs) and to explore its prognostic value.

We analyzed a retrospective monocentric series of 145 consecutive OGs with IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion. For all cases, automated FISH analyses were performed to determine 1p and/or 19q polysomy status and results were compared to manual analysis to verify the concordance of the two methods. Polysomic status was then compared to clinical and histological data, the CDKN2A deletion status when available, event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).

Our study comprised 79 grade 2 OGs (O2) and 66 grade 3 OGs (O3). Polysomy of 1p and/or 19q was observed in 58 cases (40% of whole cohort) with a significant enrichment in the high grade cohort (59% versus 24%; p < 0,0001) and recurrent cases (55%). A majority of polysomic cases were copolysomic for 1p and 19q (75% of the polysomic cohort) rather than 1p or 19q single polysomy (21% and 4% respectively). Polysomy was correlated to high grade histological criteria of high mitotic and Mib1 proliferative indices (p = 0,002 and p = 0,0005 respectively) and to vascular proliferation (p = 0,0003). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed a significant correlation betwen polysomy and a shorter EFS and OS (p = 0,02 and p = 0,016 respectively). Concordance between manual and automated analysis was almost perfect for both 1p and 19q analysis (96 and 98% respectively, κ = 0,92 and 0,95 respectively). Automated analysis revealed that the large majority of polysomic signatures are represented by a small number of R/G signals (mainly 7 signatures) allowing a very easy implementation to pre-existent FISH platforms analysis software.

1p and/ or 19q polysomy status represent a prognostic factor in OGs and can be easily determined by automated analysis. Our study supports the clinical interest to determine the polysomic status in all primitive or recurrent OGs and underline the benefits of automated analysis which offers a better archive storage and facilitates multicentric comparison.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** CDKN2A (cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) [NCBI Gene 1029]

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** IDH1 (isocitrate dehydrogenase (NADP(+)) 1) [NCBI Gene 3417] {aka HEL-216, HEL-S-26, IDCD, IDH, IDP, IDPC}, CDKN2A (cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) [NCBI Gene 1029] {aka ARF, CAI2, CDK4I, CDKN2, CMM2, INK4}, MIB1 (MIB E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1) [NCBI Gene 57534] {aka DIP-1, DIP1, LVNC7, MIB, ZZANK2, ZZZ6}
- **Diseases:** OGs (MESH:D009837)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12047829/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12047829/full.md

## References

49 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12047829/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12047829