Development and Preliminary Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Perceptions on the Implementation of UN CRPD Principles Concerning Social Inclusion and Participation of Persons with Disabilities in Municipalities
Samantha Pinna, Massimo Tusconi, Michela Atzeni, Alessandra Perra, Valerio Leonetti, Giulia Cossu, Diego Primavera, Noemi Maria Mereu, Donatella Rita Petretto, Antonio Preti, Elisa Pelosin, Mehmet Eskin, Gian Mario Migliaccio, Mauro Giovanni Carta, Federica Sancassiani

TL;DR
This paper introduces a questionnaire to assess how well municipalities implement social inclusion policies for people with disabilities, based on UN CRPD principles.
Contribution
The novel contribution is the development and preliminary validation of the PICI-Q questionnaire for evaluating CRPD implementation perceptions.
Findings
The PICI-Q achieved a high average content validity index of 0.95.
All items received high face validity scores ranging from 17 to 21.
The questionnaire is a promising tool for local authorities to improve disability inclusion policies.
Abstract
The present study aims to evaluate the preliminary content and face validity of the “Perceptions on the Implementation of the CRPD in muniCIpalities Questionnaire (PICI-Q),” a self-report questionnaire built to assess the perceptions on how effectively municipalities implement the CRPD principles concerning social inclusion and participation of persons with disabilities in municipalities. A two-step Delphi methodology was used to build the questionnaire and assess its content and face validity. A group including health professionals, academics, experts in psychometrics, persons with disabilities and local policymakers was involved in building the questionnaire according to the CRPD articles regarding social inclusion and active participation of persons with disabilities. Two pools of experts assessed the content and face validity and lay stakeholders, respectively. An average content…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEnvironmental and Social Impact Assessments · Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport · Urban Transport and Accessibility
