Validity and Reliability of the Tunisian Arabic Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) and Functional Outcome Factors in a Sample of Patients with Bipolar Disorder
Hend Jemli, Uta Ouali, Ons Maatouk, Ahlem Hajri, Azza Ben Cheikh Ahmed, Amina Aissa, Rabaa Jomli

TL;DR
This study validated a Tunisian Arabic version of the FAST tool for assessing functional outcomes in bipolar disorder and identified factors linked to functional impairment.
Contribution
The study provides cross-cultural validation of the FAST tool in Tunisian Arabic and identifies clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with functional impairment.
Findings
The Tunisian Arabic FAST showed high test-retest reliability and good concurrent validity with GAF and WHOQOL-BREF.
Functional impairment was significantly linked to low education, living alone, early onset, and treatment combinations.
A FAST score cut-off of 26 effectively distinguished bipolar patients from healthy controls.
Abstract
Bipolar disorders negatively impact functional outcomes and, consequently, prognosis. The Functioning Assessment Short Test is a reliable tool to evaluate functional outcomes in people with bipolar disorders. The aim of the study was to conduct a cross-cultural validation of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) and to explore correlations between functional impairment and sociodemographic and clinical variables. A cross-sectional study was carried out in a population of 60 bipolar patients and 60 healthy controls. The scales administered were the Global Functioning Assessment (GAF), the World Health Organization Quality Of Life-Bref (WHOQOL-BREF), the FAST, and a questionnaire containing sociodemographic and clinical variables. The validation study was based on face and content validity, reliability, and construct validity. The face and content validity were satisfactory. The…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBipolar Disorder and Treatment · Schizophrenia research and treatment · Stuttering Research and Treatment
