Genome-wide identification and integrative analysis of KNOX family characterization, duplication and expression provide insights into PEG-induced drought stress in Toona fargesii
Qiuwei Zhong, Qiangqiang Cheng, Xuanjin Du, Yao Xiao, Chunce Guo, Lu Zhang, Jikai Ma
TL;DR
This study identifies and analyzes KNOX genes in Toona fargesii to understand their role in drought resistance, especially focusing on the TfKNAT3/4 genes.
Contribution
The study provides new insights into the role of KNOX genes, particularly TfKNAT3/4, in drought resistance in Toona fargesii.
Findings
21 putative TfKNAT genes were identified and classified into three subfamilies.
TfKNAT3/4 genes showed increased expression under PEG-induced drought stress and ABA treatment.
TfKNAT3/4 genes contain ABA-responsive elements and interact with drought-related proteins.
Abstract
Toona fargesii A. Chev. (T. fargesii), a precious tree with timber and medicinal properties, belongs to the Toona genus of the Meliaceae family. It is an endangered species in China, owing to various issues including the concerns about the drought aspect. KNOXs (knotted-like homeoboxes), a subset of TALE transcription factors, play pivotal roles in development and abiotic stress including drought resistance. The recent publication of the T. fargesii genome, indicating a specific whole-genome duplication (WGD) event in the Toona genus, serves as a valuable resource for uncovering the role of KNOX genes in T. fargesii. Here, genome-wide analysis including identification, synteny and duplication of KNOX genes was conducted to unveil their characterization and evolution. Moreover, gene structures, protein-protein interaction (PPI), subcellular localizations and expression patterns were also…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 10
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9- —https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001809National Natural Science Foundation of China
- —Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education in Science and Technology project
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPlant Molecular Biology Research · Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy · Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Introduction
Toona fargesii (2n = 2x = 56) is a versatile tree species with pinnately compound leaves in the Toona genus of the Meliaceae family. This tree is used in folk medicine across many regions of southern Asia. The bark and roots of T. fargesii contain limonoids, which are essential medicinal components for treating parasites and rashes [1]. This species has often been misidentified as Toona ciliata M. Roem. (T. ciliata), as their overlapping distributions and similar morphologies, such as tall trees, compound leaves and reddish wood. T. fargesii is often called ‘Chinese mahogany’ thanks to its exquisite wood, which is utilized for high-grade furniture and decorations. Furthermore, T. fargesii is an endangered species in China due to anthropogenic factors and natural obstacles. It is widely distributed in the southeast of subtropical Asia and extensively cultivated in southern China, including Jiangxi, Hunan, Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang provinces. However, the population of T. fargesii is sporadically distributed in small clusters, often approaching to water sources in the wild. Indeed, this species largely demands for water in afforestation. Notably, a recent study suggested that the growth of T. ciliata, a congeneric species of T. fargesii, is likely to continue to decline under drying conditions induced by global warming [2]. Hence, drought stress induced by climate change could be a threat that needs concerns in the conservation and breeding process of T. fargesii.
KNOXs are plant-specific TALE transcription factors that widely exist in the plant kingdom and are involved in plant growth, development and biological processes, such as leaf development, vascular cambium maintenance and meristem establishment [3–7]. Ever since Sarah Hake and her colleagues discovered a ‘knotted-1’ mutant with knotted nodules on leaves in maize, the KNOX genes have been identified in several species [8–10]. Notably, it is reported that several KNOX genes contribute to drought resistance [11–13]. For instance, PagKNAT2/6b can directly inhibit the synthesis of gibberellin (GA), altering plant architecture and improving drought resistance in Populus (Populus alba × P. glandulosa). Recently, GhKNOX4-A and GhKNOX22-D, homologs to AT5G11060.1 (KNAT4) and AT5G25220.1 (KNAT3), were identified in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) as responsive to drought stress. These genes were suggested to enhance drought resistance through the interaction between GhKNOX4-A and GhABF2, which regulates ABA hormone levels to coordinate stomatal opening and manage oxidative stress [13].
KNOX proteins typically possess two helical structures (helix 1 and helix 2) with three additional amino acids, forming a homeodomain (HD) structure [14]. The HD domain at the C-terminus of KNOX proteins plays essential roles in functional mediation and interacts with specific sites on target genes through helical structures. In addition to the HD domain at the C-terminus, the N-terminus of KNOX contains a conserved MEINOX (MEIS-KNOX) domain composed of KNOX1 and KNOX2 domains, which recognize the promoters of target genes and exert specific regulatory effects. In addition, most KNOX proteins have evolved an ELK domain that may perform auxiliary functions [7]. Moreover, KNOX proteins can target genes that are critical for hormone mediation through conserved KNOX domains that orchestrate regulatory networks in plants [15, 16]. For example, a few KNOX genes target GA20ox genes, crucial gibberellin biosynthesis genes, through the recognition of sequences of GA20ox cis-regulatory elements, such as ‘TGAC’ and ‘GTGAC’, thereby degrading gibberellin levels [12, 15–19]. Additionally, both OsIPT2 (adenosine phosphate isopentenyltransferase 2) and OsIPT3, which catalyze the rate-limiting step of CK biosynthesis, contain the binding motif ‘TGTGAC’ and can also be targeted by OSH15, a typical KNOX member to maintain cytokinin levels in rice [18, 20, 21].
KNOX genes are generally organized into three subfamilies, namely, class I KNOX, class II KNOX and class M KNOX, according to their sequence similarity, gene structure and gene expression pattern. In Arabidopsis, class I KNOX genes include KNAT1/BP, KNAT2, KNAT6, and STM, and class II KNOX genes are composed of KNAT3, KNAT4, KNAT5, and KNAT7 [8, 22]. In addition, class M KNOX proteins are classified into a subgroup that lacks the ELK and HD domains [23]. The members of different subfamilies predominantly present distinct functions in plants. Early studies revealed that KNOX genes strongly contribute to leaf complexity [24–26]. For instance, a previous study revealed the important roles of KNOX genes in compound leaves during evolution in Cardamine hirsuta, a close relative of Arabidopsis with dissected leaves [24, 27]. In particular, class I KNOX genes, which are most closely related to leaf complexity and asymmetric development, have been extensively studied. KNOX genes play negative or positive roles in secondary cell wall deposition, which is critical for wood quality [10, 28, 29]. Especially, a few members of the class I subfamily have been identified as repressors that participate in secondary cell wall (SCW) formation [10, 29, 30]. KNOX1-overexpressing mutant plants present a reduction in lignin content in both maize and tobacco [31]. Similarly, a recent study reported that PagKNAT2/6b, an ortholog of KNAT2 and KNAT6, was highly expressed in phloem and xylem and that overexpressing PagKNAT2/6b resulted in altered vascular patterns characterized by decreased secondary xylem with thin cell walls containing less cellulose, xylose and lignin in poplar (P. alba × P. glandulosa) [29]. In contrast to class I KNOX genes, class II KNOX genes exhibit widespread expression patterns underlying their multiple functions [32]. For example, KNAT7, a class II KNOX gene, also serves as a negative regulator of secondary wall biosynthesis and functions in a negative feedback loop that represses metabolically inappropriate commitment to secondary wall formation in Arabidopsis [33], whereas KNAT7-1 regulates physical seed dormancy in mungbean (Vigna radiata) [34]. KNOX4, which is also a class II KNOX, controls seed physical dormancy in Medicago truncatula [35]. In M. truncatula,* MtKNOX4* plays a crucial role in integrating the CK pathway and boundary regulators, providing new insights into the roles of class II KNOX in regulating the elaboration of compound leaves [36]. In apple (Malus domestica Borkh.), MdKNOX19, a homolog of KNAT3/4, cooperate with MdABI5 coordinating ABA levels [37].
Albeit KNOX has been characterized in Arabidopsis, Populus, and other species, little information is available regarding the KNOX in T. fargesii. Recently, the genomic study of T. fargesii identified a specific whole-genome duplication (WGD) event, offering valuable resources for investigating the role of KNOX genes in this species [38]. To primarily understand the changes of KNOX family genes during the evolution, genome-wide analysis was performed to elucidate the identification, classification, evolution, structure of the TfKNAT family. More importantly, the characterization, sequence similarity, expression patterns, regulatory networks and subcellular localization of TfKNAT genes were conducted to deeply explore their potential value contributing to the drought and development such as wood formation in T. fargesii. This study may lay foundation for the identification, characterization, expression pattern of TfKNAT family and provide insights into and evolution of gene families in the Toona genus.
Methods and methods
Plant materials and genetic information
The materials, including roots, leaves (leaflets and leaf petioles), flowers, buds and stems (xylem and phloem tissues), were sampled from mature trees of T. fargesii cultivated at Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang city, China (E115°49’36”, N28°45’45”). The samples were stored in a -80 °C refrigerator to prepare for gene cloning and qRT‒PCR (quantitative real-time PCR) verification. The genome of T. fargesii used for analysis and set to be released on October 18, 2025, was obtained from our group [38]. The genomic information of other species, including A. thaliana, was downloaded from the phytozome database (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/). Moreover, the tobacco plants (Nicotiana benthamiana) used for the subcellular location assay were cultivated under long-day conditions (illumination at 23 °C for 16 h and darkness at 16 °C for 8 h) and then transplanted to pots filled with a mixture of soil, vermiculite or sand at a 1:1:1 ratio.
Identification and physicochemical properties of KNOX family in T. fargesii
Since KNOX typically contains four conserved domains: PF05920 (homeobox KN domain), PF03790 (KNOX1 domain), PF03791 (KNOX2 domain), and PF03789 (ELK domain), these domains were obtained from the Pfam database according to a previously reported KNOX family [39]. Then, redundant sequences were manually removed. To further examine potential members of the KNOX family, a hidden Markov model (HMM) was performed by using HMMER (v3.0) with Pfam sequences. The sequences with homologous alignment and HMM (e value < 1e-20) were considered candidate KNOX genes. The candidate sequences were further screened by the KNOX domains via PFAM (http://pfam.xfam.org/) and SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de). The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST v2.14) was also employed to generate homologous sequences between the KNAT and TfKNAT proteins [40].
To predict KNOX properties in T. fargesii, the physicochemical properties of each putative TfKNAT protein were analyzed via ExPASy (https://www.ExPASy.org). SWISS-MODEL (swissmodel.expasy.org) and I-TASSER (https://zhanggroup.org/I-TASSER) were employed to predict the three-dimensional structure of the TfKNOX proteins. The subcellular localization of TfKNAT proteins was anticipated by using Cell-Ploc with the Plant-mPLoc model (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi).
Phylogenetic tree, chromosome localization and collinearity analysis
Clustal Omega (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/services) was used for sequence analysis of KNOX members from seven species, including T. fargesii,* Arabidopsis thaliana*, Zea mays, Oryza sativa, Populus trichocarpa, Solanum lycopersicum, and Allium sativum, which were downloaded from PlantTFDB v5.0 (https://planttfdb.gao-lab.org/index.php). KNOX members of these species were aligned via MAFFT (v7.0) with default parameters. MEGA (v11.0) was employed to analyze these KNOX sequences and construct a phylogenetic tree by the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method with 1,000 bootstrap repeats. Evolview v2.0 (http://www.evolgenius.info/evolview) was subsequently used to polish the figure of the phylogenetic tree. To better understand gene evolution and duplications, we extracted the chromosome distribution of TfKNAT members from the annotation of the T. fargesii genome. Then, collinearity analysis was conducted to further verify the gene duplications within the species. In addition, we performed collinearity analysis of the KNOX genes among T. fargesii, T. sinensis (A.Juss.) M.Roem. (T. sinensis) and A. thaliana.
Ka/Ks (nonsynonymous substitution rate/synonymous substitution rate) ratios were calculated to examine the selection pressure on the evolution of TfKNAT genes calculated by using MCScanX [41]. The ratio of 𝐾𝑎/𝐾𝑠 above 1.0 indicates purifying selection, whereas the ratio of 𝐾𝑎/𝐾𝑠 below 1.0 suggests purifying or negative selection [43]. Besides, the divergence time was calculated by the formula T = Ks/2r, with Ks being the synonymous substitutions per site and r being the rate of divergence for nuclear genes from plants. The r was taken to be 1.5 × 10^− 8^ synonymous substitutions per site per year for dicotyledonous plants [42, 43]. Tandem duplication referred to duplicates that were next to each other in the genome, leading to rapidly expanding gene families. Segmental duplication involved larger sections of the genome being duplicated, potentially resulting in greater functional diversity. Tandem duplication was identified by duplicates that were next to each other in the genome and were less than 10 kb in length. Additionally, duplicates that were longer than 10 kb were regarded as segmental duplications [44, 45].
Gene structure and protein motif, cis-elements and protein–protein interaction (PPI) analysis
The conserved motifs of the TfKNAT protein were identified by the MEME suite (http://memesuite.org) [46]. After that, NCBI Batch Web CD-Search (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/bwrpsb/bwrpsb.cgi) was carried out to predict the conserved domains of the TfKNAT protein family in T. fargesii. Additionally, pygff (v2.0) was used to extract the 2000 bp upstream sequences of the TfKNAT genes as promoter regions. The PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html) database was used to indentify the cis-elements in the extracted sequences. Besides, we manually optimized the cis-elements and supplemented several drought related cis-regulatory elements including ABA-responsive element, dehydration responsive element, antioxidant responsive element, W-box and TCA-element. Finally, the figures of the motifs, gene structures, cis-elements and responsive functions were merged and visualized.
The homologous gene sequences of Arabidopsis were input into the STRING (https://cn.string-db.org/) database to construct a protein‒protein interaction (PPI) network of TfKNAT proteins (https://string-db.org/) [47]. The homologous protein sequences were subsequently aligned against the T. fargesii genome. The genes of Arabidopsis were substituted with homologous genes of T. fargesii [48]. The PPI networks were established by Cytoscape v3.7.2 (https://cytoscape.org/).
The isolation of TfKNAT genes and vector construction for subcellular localization
Total RNA was extracted from different tissues of T. fargesii from the materials described according to the instructions of the Total RNA Extraction Kit for Plants (provided by TianGen Biotech). The concentration, purity, and quality of the RNA were detected using a nucleic acid spectrophotometer and 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis. Qualified RNA samples were then reverse transcribed into cDNA using the EasyScript^®^ First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix Reverse Transcription Kit (provided by QuanSheng Biotech Co., Ltd.) and stored at -20 °C. Next, specific primers (Table S2) were designed via Oligo (v7.0) software and synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. The PCR amplification system consisted of a 50 µL reaction mixture, following the instructions of the 2×TransStart^®^FastPfu Fly PCR SuperMix, which contained 1 µL of cDNA template, 25 µL of 2×TransStart^®^FastPfu Fly PCR SuperMix, 1 µL of each of the forward and reverse primers (10 µmol/L), and 18 µL of nuclease-free water. The PCR amplification program for the target gene reaction was as follows: initial denaturation at 98 °C for 1 min; denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s, annealing at 58 °C for 5 s, and extension at 72 °C for 10 s for 30 cycles; and a final extension at 72 °C for 1 min. The PCR products were preliminarily detected for size and quality using 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis.
To better know the characterization of TfKNAT genes, the subcellular localization experiment was conducted. The primers were designed using Oligo (v7.0) to amplify and purify the TfKNAT family genes (Table S2). The pCAMBIA1304 vector containing the 35S promoter and GFP was digested with the NcoI and SpeI restriction endonucleases. The amplified gene and the digested vector were ligated to construct a vector, pCAMBIA1304-TfKNAT-GFP, driven by the 35S promoter. The ligated plasmid was subsequently transformed into competent Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 cells, which were cultured on LB supplemented with kanamycin at 28 °C for 2‒3 days. Single colonies were picked, and the positive strains were screened via PCR and then verified via first-generation sequencing (Shanghai Biotech Co., Ltd.). After the construction of the overexpression vector, the pCAMBIA1304-GFP and pCAMBIA1304-TfKNAT-GFP fusion vector strains were infiltrated into five-week-old N. benthamiana leaves via a buffer mixture (10 mM MES pH 5.6, 10 mM MgCl_2_, or 200 µM acetosyringone) [49]. After 24 h of incubation in the dark, the GFP signals were detected using a confocal laser scanning microscope (OLYMPUS FV3000).
Drought stress and hormones treatments and expression patterns determined by qRT‒PCR
As mentioned above, warming and drought conditions might threaten T. fargesii, and KNOX genes significantly contribute to the drought resistance of many plants. One-year-old T. fargesii seedlings were used for the drought stress experiment. The drought stress experiments were designed including a PEG treatment at a concentration of 75 mM to simulate drought conditions according to previous studies [50, 51]. The treatment durations were 0 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, respectively. Five plants from each treatment were used as replicates. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that KNOX is closely related to the regulation of plant hormones. To investigate the hormones impact on gene expression, we applied treatments with three hormones: cytokinin (kinetin, 10 µM), auxin (IAA,10 µM), and abscisic acid (ABA, 100 µM), which is highly associated with the drought stress. The seedlings were sprayed with these hormones, and samples were collected 6 h later to assess relative expression levels of KNOX family members according to the PEG treatment results.
The primers for qRT‒PCR were designed by using Oligo v7.0 to analyze the expression pattern of each TfKNAT family member. To specify primer sequences and avoid interference from homologous sequences, the primers were aligned against the genome (Table S1). The actin gene was used as the internal reference gene [52]. The PCR conditions were as follows: 60 s at 95 °C for initial denaturation, followed by 40 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C, 60 s at 60 °C, 15 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C, and 15 s at 95 °C for annealing. The standard deviations (SDs) were calculated in triplicate. The relative expression levels were calculated using the 2^−ΔΔCT^ method. The statistical analysis of the data was performed by SPSS (v24.0) with one-way ANOVA model and LSD test.
Results
Identification of TfKNAT genes and analysis of their physicochemical properties
To better extract the members of KNOX in T. fargesii, HMMER and BLAST were both implemented, and their results were unified. To reveal the evolutionary relationships of the TfKNAT genes, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the KNOX protein sequences derived from six species, including A. thaliana, Z. mays, O. sativa, P. trichocarpa, S. lycopersicum, and A. sativum (Fig. 1; Table S3). Consequently, a total of 21 TfKNAT members were identified and clustered into three subfamilies composed of six subclades. TfKNATs are classified into three subfamilies: class I KNOX, class II KNOX and class M KNOX. The class I KNOX subfamily was divided into three clades, namely, KNAT1-like, STM-like, and KNAT2/6-like; class II had two clades, namely, KNAT7-like and KNAT3/4-like; and class M possessed only one clade, namely, KNATM-like, which included TfKNATMa, TfKNATMb and TfKNATMc three members, according to the classification of KNOX genes in Arabidopsis (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree analysis of KNOX members among T. fargesii, A. thaliana, Z. mays, O. sativa, P. trichocarpa, S. lycopersicum, and A. sativum species. The red names indicate the members of TfKNAT of T. fargesii
Furthermore, the characterization of proteins encoded by TfKNAT genes was presumed by multiple methods. First, the length of the protein encoded by the TfKNAT genes varied from 134 aa to 521 amino acid (aa). The shortest amino acid sequence was TfKNATMa, which is 134 aa in length, whereas the longest sequence was encoded by the TfKNAT3/4a gene, which is 521 aa in length. Additionally, the relative molecular weights of the proteins encoded by the TfKNAT genes ranged from 15531.21 to 58958.71 Daltons (Da) and were positively correlated with amino acid length. Moreover, the theoretical isoelectric point analysis exhibited that all of the KNOX proteins exhibit isoelectric points below 7.0, indicating that they both encode acidic amino acid sequences. Among them, TfKNAT2/6b presented the lowest isoelectric point at 4.82, while TfKNAT3/4a presented the highest isoelectric point (pI) at 6.68. In addition, the instability coefficients ranged from 40.29 to 64.73, which were greater than 40.0, indicating that all the TfKNAT proteins were unstable and that all the TfKNAT proteins were hydrophilic, and the prediction of their subcellular localization revealed that they were predicted to be located in the cell nucleus (Table 1).
Table 1. Basic information of the TfKNAT in T. fargesiiGene nameNumber of amino acid (aa)Molecular weight (Da)Theoretical pIInstability indexAliphatic indexGrand average of hydropathicitySubcellular localization prediction TfKNAT1a 36541525.396.0949.0361.26-0.899Nucleus. TfKNAT1b 36541644.426.150.1759.64-0.924Nucleus. TfKNAT2/6a 33037558.014.9349.4362.15-0.762Nucleus. TfKNAT2/6b 33638379.774.8247.1761.9-0.757Nucleus. TfKNAT2/6c 31935954.335.2434.3468.24-0.636Nucleus. TfKNAT2/6d 31835818.225.2234.3769.62-0.567Nucleus. TfKNAT2/6e 30935415.024.8440.3370.78-0.644Nucleus. TfKNAT2/6f 31335764.465.0940.1172.68-0.592Nucleus. TfKNAT3/4a 52158958.716.6849.6376.05-0.772Nucleus. TfKNAT3/4b 44650396.495.7151.1770.85-0.854Nucleus. TfKNAT3/4c 35339927.365.6655.3468.53-0.833Nucleus. TfKNAT3/4d 35340018.445.650.6569.07-0.862Nucleus. TfKNAT7a 29733582.926.3259.1884.38-0.612Nucleus. TfKNAT7b 28732739.976.3264.7383.59-0.655Nucleus. TfKNATMa 13415531.215.3965.7560.45-1.073Nucleus. TfKNATMb 14016099.765.2263.1362.79-1.037Nucleus. TfKNATMc 16218401.874.9842.1477.72-0.663Nucleus. TfSTMa 30134064.405.5856.464.55-0.662Nucleus. TfSTMb 35940550.476.1452.3557.63-0.736Nucleus. TfSTMc 32736177.985.9238.8367.77-0.488Nucleus. TfSTMd 32736448.185.6840.2964.22-0.58Nucleus.
Analysis of TfKNAT gene location, collinearity and duplication
Fig. 2. Gene locations and synteny of TfKNAT genes. (A) Gene location and duplication analysis of TfKNAT genes. Red signifies a high density of genes on the chromosome; blue represents a low density of genes on the chromosome. (B) Gene locations and interchromosomal relationships of TfKNAT genes. The circos plot represents, from inside to outside, synteny relationships between chromosomes, GC content, gene density and chromosomes. The orange lines represent pairs of syntenic relationships in the class I KNOX family, the green lines indicate pairs of syntenic relationships in the class II KNOX family, and the blue lines signify pairs of syntenic relationships in the class M KNOX family
To further understand the TfKNAT gene location on the chromosomes (Chr), the chromosomes were adjusted to be in same direction according to the gene density on the chromosome. Generally, all the TfKNAT genes were distributed on the 14 chromosomes, including Chr1, Chr7, Chr10, Chr12, Chr13, Chr16, Chr21, Chr19, Chr23, and Chr25 (Fig. 2A). Notably, the genes TfKNAT2/6d, TfKNAT7b, and TfKNATMb were sequentially colocalized on Chr13, resembling gene linkages, and their corresponding paralogs, TfKNAT2/6c, TfKNAT7a, and TfKNATMa, colocalized on Chr21 in the same order. Additionally, a similar phenomenon was observed on Chr7 and Chr11, where TfKNAT3/4a and TfKNAT3/4c were colocalized on Chr7, while their paralogs, TfKNAT3/4b and TfKNAT3/4d, were similarly colocalized on Chr11 (Fig. 2A).
To further examine the relationships among the TfKNAT genes within the species, interspecies collinearity analysis was systematically conducted. Here, the TfKNAT gene family exhibited a significant paralogous relationship, which might have originated from large-scale chromosome duplications, leading to TfKNAT gene family expansion. Except for Chr23 and Chr27, each paralogous pairs were separately located on two different chromosomes whose lengths and gene density were relatively similar. Moreover, these paralogs displayed high collinearity (Fig. 2B).
Additionally, the 𝐾𝑎/𝐾𝑠 values of the paralogous pairs were both less than 1.0, suggesting that they experienced purifying selection (Table S4). No tandem duplications were detected on any of the chromosomes. In addition to TfKNATMa, all the TfKNAT genes underwent duplications in the genome. Furthermore, we calculated the divergence time between the paralogs, and the divergence time ranged from 4.2 to 8.4 MYA. Interestingly, this time range was close to the WGD in the Toona genus (22.1 ~ 50.1 MYA). Strong collinearity was also detected between the chromosomes on which pairs of paralogs were separately located.
To better reveal the homologous relationship between different species, intraspecies synteny analysis was conducted among T. fargesii and two representative dicot plants, A. thaliana and T. sinensis, a close relative of T. fargesii, to further examine the relationships among the KNOX genes. In total, 21 pairs of homologs containing 65 synteny lines were found between T. fargesii and T. sinensis, indicating close relations of KNOX members between the species. Moreover, seven pairs of homologs with 29 syntenies were identified between T. fargesii and A. thaliana (Fig. S1). The KNAT genes in Arabidopsis corresponded to their homologous genes in T. fargesii partially support the reliability of TfKNAT identification. Besides, this result was correlated with the close relationships between T. fargesii and T. sinensis underlying homologous evolution in the Toona genus.
Analysis of the relationships, gene structure and motifs of the TfKNAT family
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree, encoding regions, motifs and gene structure analysis of TfKNAT. (A) Relationships of TfKNAT family members; (B) coding structure of TfKNAT; (C) conserved motifs; (D) conserved domains; (E) sequences of the motifs
Interestingly, ten pairs of paralogs were identified in the family, and the sequence similarity of the paralog pairs was greater than 79%, except for TfKNAT3/4a and TfKNAT3/4b, which had a similarity of 68.54% (Fig. 3A, Table S4). On the basis of the gene structure information extracted from the genome, analysis of the gene structures displayed that the TfKNAT genes presented similar structures, including UTRs, CDSs, and introns, between the paralogs. For instance, the TfKNAT2/6c and TfKNAT2/6d presented 90% sequence similarity and displayed almost the same UTRs, CDSs, and introns (Fig. 3B). Remarkably, TfKNAT2/6a, TfKNAT7a, TfKNAT7b, TfKNATMa, TfKNATMb and TfKNATMc lost an ELK domain. Indeed, KNOX typically contains four conserved domains: the KNOX1 domain, the KNOX2 domain, the ELK domain, and the homeobox KN domain. Nevertheless, TfKNATMa and TfKNATMb only possessed two conserved domains, namely, the KNOX1 domain and the KNOX2 domain, indicating that they belong to the same subfamily, KNOX M, which was a family reported more recently (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, TfKNAT3 lacked the KNOX2 domain, and it also lacked a UTR at the 5’ end and a motif6 (Fig. 3C and E). Moreover, the conserved protein motifs of the TfKNAT genes were analyzed by using the MEME suite, and a total of fifteen conserved motifs were identified. The length of the motifs ranged from 20 to 50 amino acids. In general, the structure of TfKNAT genes varies slightly within the family corresponding to its versatile functions. Generally, most paralogs presented similar structures, including sequences, motifs, conserved domains and CDSs, indicating that the identification of TfKNAT genes was reliable and suggesting similar functions among the paralogs.
Fig. 4. Three-dimensional structure of TfKNAT proteins
To further characterize the proteins, the three-dimensional structures of the TfKNAT proteins were predicted and visualized (Fig. 4). Except for the TfKNATM subclade, most TfKNAT proteins contained three typical three-helix structures that corresponded to three conserved domains, namely, the KNOX1, KNOX2, and homeobox KN domains. Additionally, except for the TfKNATM subclade, we found that the protein structures within the same subclade were highly similar, suggesting that they may have similar functions.
The cis-elements in upstream regions of TfKNAT genes
Fig. 5. Analysis of cis-regulatory elements in TfKNAT members. The numbers on the branches signify the reliability of the relationship
To better understand the regulatory elements of TfKNAT genes, the cis-regulatory elements in the 2000 bp upstream promoter sequences of the TfKNAT coding regions were analyzed via PlantCARE to examine the potential regulation of TfKNAT genes. The core cis-elements in the promoter region of TfKNAT genes are diversely include lots of elements responsive to plant hormone signals and environmental stresses. Among them, many cis-elements are associated with hormones, such as auxin, abscisic acid (ABA), cytokinin and MeJA, suggesting regulatory interactions between KNOX and hormones (Fig. 5). In addition, a total of 20 types of cis-acting elements related to the regulation of plant physiological activities were examined. Even though the coding sequences displayed high similarity among the paralogs, a few pairs of paralogs slightly varied in cis-elements. Analysis of these hormone-related cis-elements suggested that all the genes upstream regions, except for TfKNAT2b, contained the ABA-responsive element (ABRE) and TfKNAT3/4 subclade gene promoters had the most ABREs which are highly associated with drought stress (Fig. 5). Besides, the promoters of TfKNAT3/4 contained the most elements related to the drought stress, including dehydration responsive element, antioxidant responsive element, W-box and TCA-elements. Of these, the promoter of TfKNAT3/4d possessed 13 G-box elements, indicating the presence of numerous binding sites for various transcription factors. Execpt for the TfKNAT3/4a promoter, which had only two ABREs, the other TfKNAT3/4 promoters possessed more than six ABREs. The TfKNAT3/4d promoter had eight ABREs, indicating that the regulation of TfKNAT3/4d gene expression is closely related to ABA regulation (Fig. S2). Additionally, two auxin-responsive cis-acting elements, AuxRR-core and TGA-element, were identified in this study. Generally, most of the cis-elements gave rise to drought stress.
Interplay of TfKNAT members
Fig. 6. Protein‒protein interaction (PPI) networks of TfKNAT. The purple color and large circle represent strong interactions between the proteins. The dark purple color indicates strong interaction correlations
KNOX proteins are involved in large-scale plant development and interact with multiple genetic factors to orchestrate complex regulatory networks. As no studies have reported KNOX genes in T. fargesii, we referred to the homologs of KNOX proteins in Arabidopsis to better represent the putative regulatory networks (Fig. 6). First, interactions within the family were complex, suggesting KNOXs versatile functions in coordination. For example, TfKNAT1 was predicted to significantly interact with KNOX2 and KNOX6. Second, most of the regulators were transcription factors, such as NAC, BLH, MYB, WUS, AS1 and AS2. In particular, TfKNAT7 and TfKNATM interact with NACs, which are also vital transcription factors involved in biological regulation processes, especially abiotic stresses, indicating that these two members might participate in the abiotic resistance of T. fargesii. Third, as demonstrated above, regulators involved in the production of hormones, such as GA and auxin, were found in the networks. Specifically, GA20ox was associated with GA regulation, and ARF was related to auxin regulation, indicating its potential involvement in hormone regulation. TfKNAT3/4 can interact with BHL1, typically forming a dimer to regulate ABA hormones and increase drought resistance. TfKNAT7 can interact with OFP, which might be related to regulating secondary cell wall and lignin formation, such as OFP2 and OFP4 [53]. Additionally, the interaction between TfKNAT3/4 and KNOX7 also suggests that TfKNAT3/4 members may act as potential transcriptional activators, working together with KNAT7 to promote secondary cell wall biosynthesis [53, 54]. This finding supports our result that KNAT7 was expressed at lower levels in the xylem than in the phloem.
Subcellular localization and gene interactions of TfKNAT
Fig. 7. Subcellular location analysis using GFP fused with TfKNATs in leaf epidermal cells of tobacco. The orange arrowheads indicate signals of green fluorescent protein fluorescence
To further verify the subcellular localization of TfKNAT, all the TfKNATs were introduced into the pCAMBIA1304-GFP vector with the CaMV35S promoter. The fusion vectors were subsequently expressed in N. benthamiana leaf epidermal cells via A. tumefaciens. Most KNOX proteins with green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence, such as TfKNAT1a, TfKNAT1b, TfKNAT2/6a and TfKNAT2/6b, were primarily detected in the nuclei of leaf epidermal cells, and several TfKNATs, such as TfSTMa-d and TfKNAT2/6a-f, were also detected in the plasma membrane and cytoplasm (Fig. 7). These results were partially in accordance with the subcellular localization prediction (Table 1). Generally, class I KNOX genes were localized in both the nucleus and the plasma membrane, and class II KNOX proteins are also primarily localized in the nucleus. The localization signals of class M KNOX members are relatively weak, but they can be also observed in the nucleus.
Expression profiles of TfKNAT genes
Fig. 8. Tissue-specific expression patterns of KNAT members. Orange represents high expression of the gene; green indicates low expression of the gene. The last figure illustrates the different tissues of the plant
To clarify tissue-specific expression, comparative analysis of the relative expression levels of TfKNAT genes was performed in different tissues, including roots, stems, leaves, buds, petioles, flowers, phloem, primary xylem, and secondary xylem, respectively. To better present the specific expression patterns in different tissues, we sketched the seedlings and different tissues of T. fargesii and painted different colors representing gene expression levels (Fig. 8). The class I KNOX genes of T. fargesii, with the exception of TfSTMd, presented high expression in the leaf buds, which coincided with previous studies reporting that these genes are expressed mainly in the early stage of leaf development. In addition, a few members, including TfKNAT3/4a, TfKNAT3/4b, TfKNAT3/4c, TfKNAT3/4d and TfKNAT7b, were significantly expressed in the leaflets. TfKNAT7a was expressed at low levels in most tissues, whereas TfKNAT7b was upregulated in leaflets. Notably, we detected relatively high expression of TfKNATMa in roots, but it was seldom expressed in other tissues, indicating its involvement in roots. The gene expression levels varied across different tissues, indicating that family members within the same subclade may have slight divergences. Generally, TfKNAT family members generally play key roles in the growth and development of T. fargesii, with each member potentially performing distinct functions across different tissues.
Expression profile analysis of TfKNAT genes under PEG and hormones treatments
Fig. 9. Relative expression of TfKNAT genes under PEG stress. Data are presented as mean ± SE at each time point, with *, ** and ns indicating significant differences at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and non-significance, respectively
As mentioned above, the cis-elements of TfKNAT are largely related to drought stress, and water deficiency might be a threat to T. fargesii. We therefore detected the expression patterns of TfKNAT genes under four durations of PEG stress to further explore the potential function of TfKNAT genes with respect to drought stress. The results demonstrated that the relative expression levels of TfKNAT3/4c, TfKNATMa and TfSTMa were significantly declined under PEG stress treatment and tended to decrease with increasing PEG stress duration (Fig. 9), indicating that the stress affected their expression. The expression of TfKNATMa and TfSTMa was highly expressed in the roots, as presented above (Fig. 8), further suggesting that these genes might be involved in drought stress. Interestingly, the expression of three TfKNAT3/4 genes including TfKNAT3/4a, TfKNAT3/4b and TfKNAT3/4d, sharply increased and gradually decreased with increasing stress duration. This finding was generally consistent with the analysis of TfKNAT3/4 cis-elements, which largely included drought-related elements.
Fig. 10. The relative expression of 21 TfKNAT genes under ABA, IAA and KT treatments. CK stands for control, ABA for abscisic acid, IAA for indole-3-acetic acid, and KT for kinetin. Data are presented as mean ± SE at each treatment, with *, ** and ns indicating significant differences at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and non-significance, respectively
According to previous reports and our above prediction, KNOX genes can regulate various plant hormones, particularly auxin, cytokinin and ABA. First, we found that ABA treatment significantly increased the expression of several TfKNAT genes. Notably, the treatment enhanced the expression of threeTfKNAT3/4 genes, namely TfKNAT3/4a, TfKNAT3/4c, and TfKNAT3/4d. This result was highly coincidence with previous study and our prediction which indicated that the upstream regions of TfKNAT3/4 contain many cis-elements of ABA response. Additionally, cytokinin treatment led to decrease in several TfKNAT genes expression, but most changes were not substantial. Auxin treatment had an inhibitory effect on TfKNAT expression (Fig. 10). Generally, we observed that the expression trends of most paralogs showed high similar expression patterns strengthen our hypothesis of KNOX family expansion in T. fargesii.
Discussion
Identification, classification and evolution of TfKNAT genes
Identification and classification are integral for gene family analysis. To better understand the relationships among genes, this study identified KNOX genes in T. fargesii predominantly by referring to the well-studied KNAT genes in Arabidopsis. In Populus (P. alba × P. glandulosa), for example, a KNOX gene, pagKNAT2/6b is named according to its homologs of KNAT2/6 (KNOTTED-LIKE FROM ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA) in Arabidopsis. Accordingly, the KNOX gene in T. fargesii was named as TfKNAT, reflecting their homologs in Arabidopsis. Notably, among the 21 members, ten pairs of paralogous genes were found in the last branches of the phylogenetic tree, and each pair of paralogs presented the closest phylogenetic relationships, suggesting that the divergence of these paralogs was relatively recent and occurred simultaneously.
KNOX genes are versatile regulators and display profound diversity in plant evolution [23, 55]. Previous reviews have summarized the multiple roles played by class I and class II KNOX genes in plant developmental regulation [5, 7, 55, 56]. Class I KNOX genes are expressed mainly in meristems and are involved in transcriptional regulation, whereas class II KNOX genes exhibit more diverse expression patterns and various functions [7]. These genes are generally categorized into three subfamilies (Fig. 1). Regardless of recent duplication of the KNOX family, the class I KNOX genes diverged in early seed plants. The first duplication of the ancient KNOX1 gene likely generated STM and another gene, and the second duplication of the latter gave rise to the BP/KNAT1 and KNAT2/6 subclades [57]. Here, our results were highly coincidence with these studies. Additionally, a previous study suggested that KNOX genes duplicated into two subfamilies after the land plants diverged from algae and before the split between bryophytes and land plants occurred 400 MYA [32, 58]. Since the KNOXM subfamily was defined more recently, it is sometimes overlooked in family analysis. In the phylogenetic tree, we initially omitted the KNATM from Arabidopsis, which is unique in that it lacks the typical HD domain (Fig. 5D). Consequently, we identified a solitary branch among the KNOX members that was unclassified. We then included the members on the solitary branch with the KNATM, and it was successfully classified as the KNOX members under the KNATM subclade (Fig. 1). Additionally, most TfKNAT genes possess three typical conserved domains presenting typical KNOX functions. As mentioned above, the study defined a KNOXM subfamily in which the structure of the homeodomain was lost. Similarly, in this study, three members of TfKNAT diverged from a distinct group and contained only the two domains KNOX1 and KNOX2, strengthening that they are members of KNOXM (Fig. 5). Indeed, KNATM is in a new subfamily and is conserved in dicotyledons [23], and the KNATM family arose at a later stage during plant evolution, as it is restricted to eudicots [32].
As described in the methods section, BLAST and HMM approaches were both used to identify KNOX family members. The intersection of the results generated by the two approaches identified only 12 genes of TfKNAT in T. fargesii. Among these, four syntenies were detected and four pairs of orthologs were mapped onto seven pairs of chromosomes. Notably, TfKNAT7a and TfKNATMb were colocalized on the same chromosome (Chr13), and their paralogs were colocalized on another chromosome (Chr21) with similar locations (Fig. 2A). We speculated that a recent WGD, including at least seven pairs of chromosomal duplications, might have occurred in the species and that many duplications might have been overlooked due to limitations of identification methods. Hence, the KNOX family members were re-identified, and the result selected a combination of BLAST and HMM approaches. A total of 21 TfKNAT genes were ultimately obtained through the re-assessment. Ten pairs of paralogs were identified, except for TfKNATMc, and strong collinearity were also found between these chromosomes, on which pairs of paralogs were separately localized. For example, Chr7 and Chr11, on which TfKNAT3/4a and TfKNAT3/4b were separately located, exhibited strong collinearity and similarities in terms of gene density and chromosome length (Fig. 2). Additionally, the 𝐾𝑎/𝐾𝑠 values of the paralogous pairs were both lower than 1.0, and neither tandem duplication nor segmental duplication was found, indicating that the TfKNAT gene family was conserved and underwent purifying selection (Table S4, Fig. 2). The 𝐾𝑠 ranged from 0.15 to 0.25, which is a relatively small range, and we accordingly calculated that the divergence time ranged from 4.2 to 8.4 MYA (Table S4). Interestingly, this time range was close to a reported tetraploidization events (T. sinensis special tetraploidization) occurred approximately 15 ~ 17 MYA in T. sinensis [59, 60]. Hence, we suggest that TfKNAT family expansion is predominantly driven by the recent WGD events (tetraploidization event) in T. fargesii. In summary, the integration of these multiple methods, along with the identification of WGD events, strengthens the reliability of TfKNAT identification and provides novel insights into the gene family expansion within the Toona genus.
As above illustrated, TfKNATMc was the only gene lacking a paralog. To verify our identification, we realigned the TfKNATMc sequence with the genome to confirm that no paralogous sequence of TfKNATMc exists. On the basis of the above findings, we speculated three possible reasons for this: first, the homologous gene was lost after the WGD (7.9 MYA); second, it was unduplicated during the WGD process; and third, TfKNATMc was a novel gene and did not undergo the most recent WGD event. Remarkably, it was reported that the proportion of paralogues among the total collinear genes of T. sinensis was 93.60%. However, we speculate that the remaining portion may have been lost due to chromosomal rearrangements, which strengthens the first hypothesis. The specific reasons require further in-depth research.
Furthermore, TfKNATMc was highly expressed in roots, highlighting its important roles in root development and adaptation to more recent environmental conditions. With respect to gene expression, since the family analysis revealed that almost all members had a paralog, we designed specific primers for each gene and aligned the primers to the genome sequence to ensure their specificity, thereby avoiding the influence of homologous genes. Interestingly, the expression patterns of most genes were highly similar to those of their paralogs, resembling the co-expression pattern. It also suggests that the WGD event may have contributions to the gene dosage effect. We thus hypothesize that owing to the lack of a homolog, TfKNATMc may have crucial functions in roots and compensate for the gene dosage effect by increasing expression levels in roots. Further the functional verification and investigation of TfKNATMc may be needed in the future.
The specific expression pattern of TfKNAT
Plants alter their physiology and modify their growth and architecture to adapt to moist environments [61, 62]. As demonstrated above, T. fargesii was an endangered species in China owing to issues induced by human beings and poor habitat conditions. Recently, it was reported that T. ciliata, a close relative of T. fargesii, was likely to continually decline under drying conditions induced by global warming [2]. Indeed, drought stress could be a significant risk to T. fargesii, as this species naturally grows near rivers where water is abundant. Hence, we designed a PEG stress experiment and examined TfKNAT genes expression. A recent study suggested that GhKNOX4-A and GhKNOX22-D, two homologs of KNAT4 and KNAT3, contribute to the drought response by ABA coordination ang regulating stomatal opening and oxidative stress in cotton [13]. Similarly, our results showed that the expression of three homologs of KNAT4, TfKNAT3/4a, TfKNAT3/4b and TfKNAT3/4d, sharply increased and gradually decreased with increasing drought stress duration, and these TfKNAT3/4 genes were highly expressed in leaflets. Moreover, the subclade of TfKNAT3/4 presented the greatest number of ABRE cis-elements, which are highly related to ABA indicating that they were sensitive to the drought stress and potentially contributed to drought resistance (Fig. S1). We therefore speculated that most TfKNAT3/4 genes might be involved in the process of drought stress, which is highly correlated with previous studies [13]. Of these, the ABA treatment was performed to further examine KNOX expression change by the ABA inducing. The expression of TfKNAT3/4 genes was expectedly upregulated by ABA treatment. This also strengthens our conclusion that TfKNAT3/4 genes may play crucial roles in drought response through ABA coordination. Notably, the PEG treatment used in this study simulates drought stress rather than applying it directly for two main reasons. First, drought stress treatment may involve the combined effects of various environmental factors such as temperature, air humidity and soil moisture content, whereas PEG treatment provides a more controlled simulation of drought stress. Second, the use of PEG treatment is based on relevant studies from previous studies [50, 51]. Furthermore, the purpose of this work is to analyze the characteristics of the KNOX family in T. fargesii, so the PEG treatment is more controllable, which may better facilitate our objectives. The further information between the identified TfKNAT3/4 genes and drought stress requires further investigation. In this study, the cis-regulatory elements of class II KNOX genes were highly diverse and that class II KNOX gene was extensively expressed in different tissues (Fig. 9). These implied that class II KNOX genes might be involved in multiple biological processes and highlight the evolutionary significance of class II KNOX genes in T. fargesii. In addition, transgenic plants in which STM is overexpressed are more tolerant to drought stress, suggesting that STM contributes to drought resistance in Arabidopsis [11]. Our results showed that the TfSTMa and TfSTMb genes presented relatively high expression in roots but a decreasing trend in gene expression under drought stress. Conversely, its ortholog, TfSTMc, tended to increase and then decrease in gene expression with increasing drought stress duration but exhibited low expression in roots, indicating that TfSTMc might involve in drought stress and there could be slight divergence among the members of TfSTM in T. fargesii. Therefore, we would like to know if TfKNAT genes were tissue-specifically diverged and therefore carried out further tissue-specific expression pattern analysis. The tissue-specific expression analysis further validated our hypothesis that was most paralogous genes displayed similar tissue-specific expression patterns.
All the species in the Toona genus are deciduous trees with pinnate compound leaves, such as T. fargesii, T. ciliata and T. sinensis, and they are ideal materials for exploring compound leaf formation. As vital regulators that greatly contribute to the complexity of leaves, KNOX genes, especially class I KNOX genes, are well known for promoting compound leaves. A previous study elucidated that the evolution of A. thaliana involved a recent selective sweep, cis-regulatory divergence, which involved the loss of STM leaf expression in A. thaliana, resulting in unlobed leaves [63]. Recently, a study revealed that the class II KNOX family is also involved in controlling compound leaf patterning in M. truncatula [36]. In this work, all the class II members, TfKNAT3/4a, TfKNAT3/4b, TfKNAT3/4c,* TfKNAT3/4d* and TfKNAT7a exhibited high expression in the leaflets of compound leaves, suggesting that their putative functions in compound leaf formation. These results might provide genetic information on compound leaf formation and evolution in the Toona genus. Additionally, T. fargesii is also an economic wood tree whose timber is used for manufacturing high-grade furniture and decorations. Notably, KNOX genes serve as negative or positive regulators involved in several processes of wood formation. For instance, class II KNOX can repress cell wall thickness during wood development in many plants [34, 36, 64, 65]. As mentioned above, overexpressing PagKNAT2/6b resulted in altered vascular patterns characterized by decreased secondary xylem with thin cell walls containing less cellulose, xylose and lignin in poplars. In this study, TfKNAT2a and most of class II KNOX including TfKNAT3/4c,* TfKNAT3/4d*, TfKNAT7a and TfKNAT7b were significantly downregulated in the xylem within the stem, indicating their similar functions with respect to wood quality. However, heartwood formation, by no means, solely coordinates through KNOX genes, and it is worth verification in the future. Even if we examined these paralogous genes, the divergences among these paralogs also underlie the emergence of novel functions or functional divergences.
Future studies on TfKNAT and gene evolution in Meliaceae family
Although many studies have conducted genome-wide identification of gene families in several species of the Toona genus, this study first time reports a significant duplication induced by WGD within a gene family. Given that paralogous genes present high sequence similarity and that their expression patterns have not largely diverged, several factors need to be considered in molecular biology experiments. For example, the karyotype of T. fargesii partially resembles a putative tetraploid due to the WGD but the paralogous pairs have not totally diverged in their expression patterns. Similar cases may also exist in other species of the Toona genus, including T. sinensis and T. ciliata. Even though no significant divergence between the paralogous pairs has been found in the sequences, gene structures, collinearity relationships, and expression patterns of these genes, more evidence is needed to determine whether they have diverged functionally. Besides, only the TfKNAT family exhibited the apparent duplications in this study, the other families may need to be further identified in the future in the Toona genus.
The species of the Toona genus always contains 28 pairs of chromosomes, such as T. fargesii, T. sinensis and T. ciliata [59], but the species of the Melia genus usually has 14 pairs of chromosomes, which is half as many. Whether strong synteny exists between the Toona genus and the Melia genus also needs further research for revealing the details of the evolution of the Meliaceae family. Although a genome paper of species in Melia genus, such as M. indica, has been published, the genomic data have been unreleased yet [60]. It can only be expected that more genomic data will be released in the future, which is expected to provide further supporting evidence.
Conclusion
In this study, we identified a total of 21 members of the KNOX family in the T. fargesii genome using multiple methods. Generally, TfKNAT genes were classified into three subfamilies: class I, class II, and class M, based on phylogenetic relationships. Notably, ten paralogous pairs were detected, each exhibiting high similarity in sequences, gene structures, cis-elements, subcellular localizations and expression patterns. Evolutionary analysis indicated that a specific WGD event greatly drove the expansion of the TfKNAT family. These results suggest that the duplicated genes have not significantly diverged from their original counterparts, with only slight differences observed between paralogous pairs. Additionally, the cis-regulatory elements of class II KNOX genes are more diverse than those of the other two subfamilies, partially explaining the extensive expression patterns of class II KNOX genes across different tissues. Furthermore, three TfKNAT3/4 genes contained a large number of cis-regulatory elements related to drought stress, and their expression levels sharply increased and then gradually decreased with prolonged PEG stress, indicating their role in drought stress response. Moreover, ABA treatment induced three TfKNAT3/4 genes expression indicating that these genes may play significant roles in drought response through ABA hormone mediation. Collectively, this study highlights the KNOX family genes characterization, evolution and expression and indicates TfKNAT3/4 genes may contribute to the drought resistance in T. fargesii.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Material 1
Supplementary Material 2: Table S1 The primer sequences for qRT-PCR experiment
Supplementary Material 3: Table S2 The primer sequences for the PCR experiment
Supplementary Material 4: Table S3 Protein sequence of KNOXs from T. fargesii, Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Solanum lycopersicum, Zea mays, Allium sativum and Populus trichocarpa
Supplementary Material 5: Table S4 The divergence estimation of the paraplogs
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Felipo-Benavent A, Úrbez C, Blanco-Touriñán N, Serrano-Mislata A, Baumberger N, Achard P, Agustí J, Blázquez MA, Alabadí D. Regulation of xylem fiber differentiation by gibberellins through DELLA-KNAT 1 interaction. Development (Cambridge, England) 2018;145(23).10.1242/dev.16496230389856 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Gao J, Yang X, Zhao W, Lang T, Samuelsson T. Evolution, diversification, and expression of KNOX proteins in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:822. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00882 PMC 461710926557129 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Wang X, Zhang J, Chai M, Han L, Cao X, Zhang J, Kong Y, Fu C, Wang Z-Y, Mysore KS et al. The role of class II KNOX family in controlling compound leaf patterning in Medicago truncatula. J Integr Plant Biol. 2023;65(10):2279–91.10.1111/jipb.1354937526388 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗