# Robotic partial nephrectomy is associated with a lower incidence of urine leakage following nephron-sparing surgery for kidney tumors compared to open and laparoscopic approaches

**Authors:** Husny Mahmud, Tomer Erlich, Dorit E. Zilberman, Barak Rosenzweig, Orith Portnoy, Zohar A. Dotan

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-05651-z · World Journal of Urology · 2025-04-28

## TL;DR

Robotic partial nephrectomy has a much lower risk of urine leakage compared to open and laparoscopic methods after kidney tumor surgery.

## Contribution

Shows robotic-assisted surgery significantly reduces urine leakage risk compared to other approaches.

## Key findings

- Robotic-assisted PN had a 0.75% urine leakage rate, much lower than open (3.7%) and laparoscopic (4.91%) methods.
- T1b tumors had a 15.8% leakage risk, significantly higher than T1a tumors (0.99%).
- Longer surgery and ischemia times increased the risk of urine leakage.

## Abstract

Urine leakage (UL) is a recognized complication after partial nephrectomy (PN). This study aimed to determine the incidence of UL and identify key risk factors, including tumor size and surgical approach, to clarify the impact of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open PN on postoperative outcomes.

A retrospective review of 785 consecutive clinical T1 PN cases (2012–2022) was undertaken. UL was defined as biochemically confirmed uriniferous drain output ≥ 50 mL day-1 persisting ≥ 3 days. The overall incidence of UL was assessed, and multivariable statistical tests evaluated potential predictors of leakage. (19 events; EPV = 3.8; hypothesisgenerating).

Of the 785 patients, 50.7% had RAPN, 33.8% OPN, and 15.5% LPN. The overall incidence of UL was 2.4%. RAPN demonstrated the lowest leakage rate (0.75%), compared with OPN (3.7%) and LPN (4.91%) (p = 0.03), representing a five-fold reduction in UL risk compared to open and laparoscopic approaches. Patients with T1b tumors were significantly more prone to leakage than those with T1a tumors (15.8% vs. 0.99%; multivariable odds ratio (OR) = 18.8, 95% CI = 7.15–49.44; p < 0.0001). Longer operative and ischemia times were also associated with higher leakage risk. All UL cases resolved with conservative or minimally invasive interventions.

Surgical approach, operative duration, ischemia time, and tumor size (T1b vs. T1a) emerged as principal predictors of postoperative UL. RAPN conferred a notably lower leakage risk compared to OPN and LPN, underscoring its advantages for nephron-sparing surgery, particularly in complex renal tumors requiring meticulous collecting-system closure.

Not applicable (retrospective).

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** kidney tumors (MESH:D007680), leakage (MESH:D003763), tumor (MESH:D009369), ischemia (MESH:D007511), UL (MESH:D014555)
- **Chemicals:** OPN (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12037642/full.md

## References

1 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12037642/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12037642