# Bullying and cyberbullying is associated with low levels of cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies in young people

**Authors:** Jose Luis Solas-Martínez, Manuel J. De la Torre-Cruz, Alba Rusillo-Magdaleno, Emilio J. Martínez-López

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1569400 · Frontiers in Psychology · 2025-04-14

## TL;DR

Bullying and cyberbullying are linked to lower use of learning strategies in adolescents, with girls being more affected by cyberbullying.

## Contribution

The study identifies gender-specific impacts of bullying and cyberbullying on learning strategies in adolescents.

## Key findings

- Bullying and cyberbullying are negatively associated with cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies.
- Girls affected by cyberbullying show lower scores in rehearsal, elaboration, and metacognitive self-regulation.
- Cyberbullying increases the risk of less frequent use of learning strategies by 2.5 times for both genders.

## Abstract

This study analyzed the relationship between bullying and cyberbullying, both as victims and aggressors, and the use of cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies in adolescents aged 10 to 16. A total of 1,330 Spanish students participated (48.95% boys), with an average age of 13.22 years. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was used to assess five key learning strategies: rehearsal, elaboration, organization, critical thinking, and metacognitive self-regulation. The European Bullying Intervention Project Questionnaire (EBIP-Q) and the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire (ECIP-Q) were applied to evaluate levels of bullying and cyberbullying. The association between variables was analyzed through analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and binary logistic regression analysis. The findings revealed a statistically significant negative association between bullying (traditional and cyberbullying) and the use of learning strategies for both victims and aggressors. Girls were more affected, particularly in cases of cyberbullying, where they showed lower scores in rehearsal, elaboration, and metacognitive self-regulation. In contrast, boys who were bullying aggressors scored higher in critical thinking. The risk of less frequent use of learning strategies among victims increased by 1.3 times for bullying and 2 times for cyberbullying. Similarly, this risk for aggressors rose by 1.4 times for boys and 1.8 times for girls in cases of bullying, and by 2.5 times for both genders in cases of cyberbullying. The study suggests implementing specific and cooperative actions involving students, teachers, and families to strengthen the proper use of learning strategies among victims and aggressors, especially in girls involved in cyberbullying episodes.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Bullying (MESH:D000073397)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12034706/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12034706/full.md

## References

64 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12034706/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12034706