Sociodemographic and health predictors of adherence to self-administered computerized cognitive assessment
Marisa Magno, Ana Isabel Martins, Joana Pais, Vítor Tedim Cruz, Anabela G Silva, Nelson Pacheco Rocha

TL;DR
This study identifies factors like age, gender, and education that influence adherence to long-term computerized cognitive screening in the general population.
Contribution
The study identifies specific sociodemographic and health predictors of long-term adherence to self-administered cognitive assessments.
Findings
Older age positively affects adherence to periodic cognitive screening over both 1-year and 3- to 6-year follow-ups.
Female gender, higher education, and better baseline performance in the cognitive test correlate with higher adherence at 3- to 6-year follow-ups.
Memory complaints reported by participants are associated with increased adherence in the longer-term follow-up period.
Abstract
Cognitive assessment is essential to detect early cognitive decline and guide interventions. Self-administered computerized assessment is a promising option for periodic cognitive screening in the general population. One of the most critical challenges to implementing cognitive screening in at risk populations is participants’ adherence. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine which factors are essential for adherence to long-term digital cognitive screening. This study aims to investigate potential sociodemographic and health predictors of adherence to a self-administered web-based cognitive monitoring, the Brain on Track (BoT), in the general population. Participants (n = 347) were recruited from the general community. The participants were asked to perform one BoT test every 3 months for cognitive screening and were followed at two time points, namely, 1-year and 3- to…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research · Cognitive Functions and Memory · Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
