Flow Virometry in Wastewater Monitoring: Comparison of Virus-like Particles to Coliphage, Pepper Mild Mottle Virus, CrAssphage, and Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus

TL;DR

This study compares virus-like particles with specific viruses in wastewater to understand their behavior during treatment.

Contribution

The study introduces flow virometry as a novel method for wastewater virus monitoring and compares it with traditional methods.

Findings

Virus-like particle counts increased in treated wastewater compared to influent.

Correlations between virus-like particles and targeted viruses were weak.

VLP counts decreased during filtration but increased after UV disinfection.

Abstract

Flow virometry (FVM) offers a promising approach for monitoring viruses and virus-like particles (VLPs) in environmental samples. This study compares levels of non-specific VLPs across a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) with levels of somatic coliphage, (F+) specific coliphage, Pepper Mild Mottle Virus (PMMoV), CrAssphage (CrAss), and Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus (ToBRFV). All targets were quantified in influent, secondary-treated effluent, and tertiary-treated effluent at the University of California, Davis Wastewater Treatment Plant (UCDWWTP) over 11 weeks. We established an FVM-gating boundary for VLPs using bacteriophages T4 and ϕ6 as well as four phages isolated from wastewater. We then utilize T4 alongside three submicron beads as quality controls in the FVM assay. Coliphage was measured by standard plaque assays, and genome copies of PMMoV, CrAss, and ToBRFV were measured by digital droplet (dd)PCR. FVM results for wastewater revealed distinct microbial profiles at each treatment stage. However, correlations between VLPs and targeted viruses were poor. Trends for virus inactivation and removal, observed for targeted viruses during wastewater treatment, were consistent with expectations. Conversely, VLP counts were elevated in the WWTP effluent relative to the influent. Additional sampling revealed a decrease in VLP counts during the filtration treatment step following secondary treatment but a substantial increase in VLPs following ultraviolet disinfection. Defining application boundaries remain crucial to ensuring meaningful data interpretation as flow cytometry and virometry take on greater significance in water quality monitoring.

Figures