Detection of Trypanosoma cruzi in a Reactive Blood Bank Sample in Sonora, Mexico
Idalia Paredes-Sotelo, Mónica Reséndiz-Sandoval, Adriana Garibay-Escobar, Edgar Alfonso Paredes-González, Aracely Angulo-Molina, Angel Ramos-Ligonio, Eric Dumonteil, Claudia Herrera, Olivia Valenzuela

TL;DR
This paper reports the first detection of a specific strain of Trypanosoma cruzi in a blood donor from northern Mexico, where the disease is rare.
Contribution
The study provides the first molecular characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi in a blood donor from the northwestern region of Mexico.
Findings
Seroreactivity was confirmed using in-house ELISAs with multiple antigens.
Molecular analysis confirmed the presence of the TcI DTU of Trypanosoma cruzi in the blood donor.
Next Generation Sequencing improved the accuracy of genetic characterization.
Abstract
Chagas disease is a neglected disease caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, a public health problem in both endemic and non-endemic countries. In Mexico, the southern region is considered endemic, and cases are frequently reported; however, in the northwestern region, only a few cases are confirmed annually. This study describes, for the first time, the Discrete Typing Unit (DTU) of Trypanosoma cruzi in a volunteer blood donor rejected for being reactive in the northwestern region of Mexico. Seroreactivity was confirmed using “in-house” ELISAs which employed three different antigens: total extract from Trypanosoma cruzi isolated from a vector (Triatoma rubida) from Sonora (strain T1), strain H1 and CL-Brener. The molecular characterization of Trypanosoma cruzi was conducted by amplifying satellite DNA by qPCR and posterior sequencing of the mini-exon gene, using Next Generation…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3- —Consejo Nacional de Humanidades Ciencia y Tecnología
- —scholarship
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTrypanosoma species research and implications · Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
1. Introduction
Chagas Disease (CD) is one of the neglected tropical diseases of greatest public health importance in the Americas, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi). About 6–7 million people worldwide, mainly in Latin America, are estimated to be infected with T. cruzi [1]. The disease has two phases, acute and chronic, in which patients may transition from an acute phase to a chronic infection. Usually, the acute phase lasts from 4 to 8 weeks, and is characterized by high parasitemia and mild symptoms which can be resolved spontaneously [2]. In the chronic phase, most infected people remain asymptomatic; however, 30–40% will develop cardiac and/or digestive or neurological involvement within 10–30 years [3]. The persistence of Chagas disease is linked to social, cultural, historical, political, and economic processes [4].
T. cruzi exhibits great genetic variability and is classified into seven Discrete Typing Units (DTUs) from TcI-TcVI and Tc-Bat [5,6]. The term is defined as “sets of stock that are genetically more related to each other than to any other stock and that are identifiable by common genetic, molecular or immunological markers” [7]. This genetic diversity of T. cruzi impacts its biological characteristics, such as antigenic profile, virulence factors, or variability in the efficacy of the only two drugs available for CD, Benznidazole (BNZ) and Nifurtimox (NFX) [8,9,10].
Chagas disease was once delimited to vulnerable rural areas where the vectors reside and multiple reservoir hosts of T. cruzi parasites, including sylvatic and domestic animals throughout the Americas, meaning that the infection could not be eradicated [11]; however, due to human dynamics, the epidemiological patterns have changed with urbanization. Triatomine bugs, known as kissing bugs, are the main vectors. Until now, 157 species have been classified into five tribes and 18 genera [12,13]. In Northwestern Mexico, six triatomine species have been reported: Triatoma protacta, T. incrassata, T. recurva, T. rubida, T. sinaloensis, and Paratriatoma hirsuta [14,15,16,17].
Although triatomines are found widespread across Latin America, in some regions, the population remains unaware of the risk associated with contact. These hematophagous bugs emerge at night to seek a blood meal, making it difficult for individuals to know whether they have been bitten or exposed by living in or visiting infested areas [18]. The bug defecates near the bite site, and the parasite’s infective stage can enter the body when the host rubs or scratches, allowing the passage of T. cruzi through breaks in the skin or conjunctiva; however, there are other forms of transmission, such as blood transfusion, congenital infection, organ transplantation, and oral transmission [3].
Blood transfusion is an important route of transmission of T. cruzi. Although blood bank screening has been regulated in Mexico since 2012, according to the Official Mexican Standard (NOM 253-SSA2-2012), few confirmed cases have been reported, even though infected triatomines have been reported in many regions of the country [19]. Today, screening for Chagas is only carried out on blood donors, which leaves most of the population unaware of whether they are infected and, if they are infected, without access to treatment [20]. The WHO recommends screening blood donors as well as organ and tissue donors in endemic areas, early access to diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, and screening of newborns and other children of infected mothers, to increase detection and care of the affected population all over the world [11]. Chagas disease is endemic in most of the countries of America, including Mexico. However, this disease is poorly known in the Northwest region, probably due to the low cases reported annually. This situation could explain the limited strategies to control, prevent, and monitor epidemiological surveillance.
In 2023, Mexico reported 99 acute cases (0.08/100,000) and 891 chronic cases of Chagas (0.69/100,000). The states of Veracruz and Yucatan, located in the southern region of Mexico, showed the highest incidence of chronic cases of Chagas (2.54 and 2.44/100,000, respectively). In Sonora, a predominantly arid region and the second-largest state of Mexico, only three chronic cases have been reported, with an incidence of 0.09/100,000 [21]. In contrast, Chagas disease is more prevalent in southwestern Mexico, where the climate ranges from temperate to tropical.
There is currently a wide variety of serological tests for the diagnosis of T. cruzi infection, including commercial tests with high sensitivity and specificity (>98%), which are mainly based on parasite antigens (recombinants or total extracts); however, no gold standard has been identified for an accurate and reliable diagnostic of T. cruzi infection, which is a limiting factor for these tests. The World Health Organization and most National guidelines in Latin American countries still recommend the use of two tests based on different principles and antigens, and in case of discordance, a third test can provide a final diagnosis [22].
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Real-Time quantitative PCR (qPCR) offer high sensitivity for detecting DNA, and appear as opportunities to monitor parasitic levels in the bloodstream, and several studies have evaluated their high sensitivity and specificity in amplifying nuclear DNA (SAT-DNA) and kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) sequences [23,24]. There is not a qualitative or quantitative standardized/validated PCR for T. cruzi DNA detection in diagnostic routine [23]. So far, there is no gold standard qPCR protocol to diagnose T. cruzi infections; however, the use of molecular tools supports the accuracy of these diagnostic tools [24].
The objective of this study was to analyze the presence of anti-T. cruzi antibodies using “in-house” ELISAs which employed as antigen a total extract from Trypanosoma cruzi isolated from triatomine vectors from Sonora, strain H1 and CL-Brener, respectively, and perform the molecular T. cruzi characterization in a reactive sample of a volunteer blood donor screened at the Sonora Mexico blood bank.
2. Materials and Methods
A 38-year-old male hemodonor was identified by the blood bank of Sonora, Mexico, as a reactive case of T. cruzi. Two blood samples were taken (in the absence and presence of EDTA-anticoagulant).
The presence of anti-T. cruzi antibodies were analyzed by “in-house” ELISAs, which are customized assays using three different parasite extracts: (a) TRUB/MEX/2022/T1/TcI isolated was obtained from an insect triatomine (Triatoma rubida) from Sonora, Mexico; (b) MHOM/MEX/0000/H1/TcI isolated from a patient from Yucatan, Mexico; and (c) TINF/BR/1963/CL-Brener/TcVI a reference strain, modified from Guzmán-Gómez et al., (2015) [22]. Briefly, 96-well clear flat bottom microplates (Corning, Inc., New York, NY, USA) were coated with 5 µg/mL of each crude antigen extract overnight at 4 °C and blocked with Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) (Jackson Immuno Research, Baltimore, PA, USA) 2% for 1 h at room temperature.
The serum sample was tested individually against each antigen in ELISAs. These protocols ensure both technical repeatability (triplicate wells) and biological repeatability (sample repetition on different days). The serum was diluted 1:100 in non-fat milk 1% in Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS)—tween 0.05% and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. After washing, goat anti-human IgG-HRP (Horseradish Peroxidase) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. After a final wash, 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate solution (Immunochemistry, Hennepin, MN, USA.) was added and incubated at room temperature, protected from the light, and the reaction was stopped after 15 min with 1 M sulfuric acid (H_2_SO_4_) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Absorbance was read on a microplate absorbance reader at 450 nm (Thermo Scan Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The cut-off OD (optical density) value for commercial ELISA tests was determined according to each manufacturer’s recommendations. For in-house ELISA tests, the cutoff point was defined as the mean OD of negative serum samples (n = 20) plus three standard deviations. In order to be able to compare the results of the different ELISA assays used, the results are presented as the resulting value of the optical density/cut-off line of each assay [25]. The Chagas III ELISA diagnostic kit (BiosChile, Santiago, Chile) was also used according to the supplier’s instructions.
Genomic DNA was extracted from an EDTA-blood sample using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR (qPCR), also known as quantitative PCR, was used to amplify the satellite DNA of T. cruzi using StepOne Real-Time PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems™, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The primers used for amplification (TCZ3-Fw: TGC TGC AST CGG CTG ATC GTT TTC GA and TCZ2-Rv: CCT CCA AGC AGC GGA TAG TTC AGG) were described previously [26], using Brillant III ultra-fast SYBR green PCR (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The PCR cycling conditions consisted of an initial step of 3 min at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of denaturalization at 95 °C for 10 s and annealing/extension at 60 °C for 10 s. The sample was considered positive for T. cruzi if the Cycle Threshold (Ct) was <40. Each reaction included positive (DNA from a T. cruzi-positive sample) and negative controls (nuclease-free water). Amplification specificity was confirmed by melting curve analysis, with a single peak indicating specific product amplification.
As previously reported, discrimination between the discrete typing units (DTUs) was performed using a Nested-PCR for the amplification of the mini-exon gene with the primers UTCC, TC, and TC2 [27]. The oligonucleotide sequences of the primers are UTCC-Fw: CGT ACC AAT ATA GTA CAG AAA CTG, TC2-Rv: CCT GCA GGC ACA CGT GTG TG and TC-Fw: CCC CCC TCC CAG GCC ACA CTG. For the primary PCR, the DNA sample was used as the template, UTCC-Fw and TC2-Rv were used for primers. For the secondary PCR, 1 µL of primary PCR product was used as the template, the primers were TC-Fw and TC2-Rv. Each PCR consisted of 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and final extension at 72 °C for 30 s, with an initial denaturation of 5 min at 94 °C and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis (2% agarose). The expected product size is 300 base pairs for TcII-TcVI or 350 base pairs for TcI. Amplicon was purified for sequencing on MiSeq (Illumina San Diego, CA, USA) platform. Sequence files were imported in Geneious 11.0.2 software for analysis and mapped using T. cruzi reference sequences as previously described [28]. Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the approximately maximum likelihood method implemented in FastTree with 1000 bootstrap replicates to confirm DTU classification and relationship with reference sequences.
3. Results and Discussion
Although 65 years have passed since the first case of CD was reported in Guaymas, Sonora [29], this study describes, for the first time, the presence of T. cruzi in a volunteer blood donor from the northwestern region of Mexico. The blood donor was 38 years old, worked in mining, and lived in a house with a cement floor and thatched roof. He reported having pets at home but did not recognize nor know triatomine vectors. In 2015, he visited a rural area and, at the age of 17, visited Tucson, Arizona. He had never received a blood transfusion or donated organs, and donated blood in 2008 without T. cruzi screening. In 2018, he donated blood again and was found reactive for T. cruzi by the blood bank. Remarkably, there was no subsequent follow-up or monitoring to assess clinical status, potential treatment or further epidemiological surveillance. This lack of follow-up increases the risk of disease progression and is a missed opportunity for early treatment.
The treatment of Chagas disease has been ongoing for 50 years and relies on two drugs: BNZ and NFX. These have great effectiveness in acute infections but significant side effects due to the oxidative stress reactive metabolites generated, which can eliminate T. cruzi, but harm the organism [2]. It is not clear whether these drugs can effectively cure patients infected with other Trypanosoma species due to metabolic differences, but they have been tested in studies as a combination of drugs [30,31].
Despite the high discordance between the serologic methods used for the diagnosis of Chagas in Mexico [22], the analysis of the serum sample showed the presence of anti-T. cruzi IgG antibodies using the three “in-house” ELISA tests, which employed each extract antigens (T1, H1 and CL Brener) independently, observing a greater reactivity to the extracts of the T1 and H1 isolates (TcI DTU) compared with the CL-Brener reference strain (TcVI) (Figure 1). In addition, the sample was also reactive using the commercial diagnostic kit Chagas III ELISA diagnostic kit (BiosChile, Santiago, Chile).
It has been stated that the genetic variability of the parasite may affect the performance of the serological tests, due to the different antigenic profiles. Hence, previous studies have recommended employing antigen extracts from local parasites to enhance the sensitivity of the test [32]. Regarding actual serological diagnostic methods, the use of total antigenic extracts of T. cruzi has shown good results compared to commercial tests [4]. The present results clearly distinguish that the use of the local strain allowed the recognition of antibodies specific to T. cruzi whole antigens obtained from the vector Triatoma rubida of Sonora, México (local strain).
It has also been observed that the detection of the parasite’s genetic material using molecular tools is a very important diagnostic complement, despite its limitations, such as low or intermittent parasitemia in the chronic phase [24,33]. The molecular detection of T. cruzi DNA offers multiple advantages that can enhance the reliability of the molecular techniques [24].
The presence of T. cruzi in the blood sample was confirmed by qPCR (Ct = 33), and the mini-exon gene was amplified, producing the characteristic band of TcI DTU (350 bp) (Figure 2), which was confirmed by sequencing (GenBank Accession Number PP993262) and phylogenetic analysis (Figure 3), indicating that it is closely related to a TcI sequence from a patient from Yucatan, Mexico. The detection of a TcI DTU is not surprising since it is widely distributed in the Mexican territory [34]; however, most isolates come from vectors. In addition, this DTU is not only associated with sylvatic cycles, but also with domestic cycles and clinical manifestations such as Chagasic cardiomyopathy [35]. The detection of T. cruzi in the blood donor sample is alarming, because it may imply an active risk for transfusion-related transmissions, as there are discordant results between serological methods currently employed for CD screening. This study confirmed the presence of the Trypanosoma cruzi by qPCR in a volunteer blood donor rejected for being reactive in the northwestern region of Mexico.
The risk of T. cruzi infection after a transfusion from an infected donor ranges between 10 and 25% depending on the blood component and increases in polytransfused patients [18]. Data from the National Blood Transfusion Center in Mexico show that, in the state of Sonora, 163,416 transfusions were recorded from 2018 to 2020. This suggests that, without proper screening, more than 160,000 people could be at risk of acquiring the infection. For several decades, total extracts of the parasite have been used for diagnosis and shown to provide good results [36]. However, due to the diversity of the parasite, the use of antigens from local strains has been recommended to ensure diagnosis, as they present a greater number of antigens that may be recognized by antibodies [22].
4. Conclusions
The serological analysis demonstrated that the “in-house” ELISA, using total parasite extracts from local strains, proved effective in detecting anti-T. cruzi antibodies. Additionally, molecular techniques confirmed the presence of TcI DTU in the blood sample, further supporting the accuracy of these diagnostic tools. The presence of vectors infected with T. cruzi suggests that vectorial transmission in the state of Sonora is an underexplored area. This highlights the urgent need to implement vector control programs and epidemiological monitoring of Chagas disease, which would allow for timely detection and early treatment.
Considering the risk associated with transfusion-transmitted infections, it is crucial to ensure rigorous testing of blood donors and enhance public health strategies to mitigate the spread of Chagas disease.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1de Andrade G.N. Bosch-Nicolau P. Nascimento B.R. Martins-Melo F.R. Perel P. Geissbühler Y. Demacq C. Quijano M. Mosser J.F. Cousin E. Prevalence of Chagas disease among Latin American immigrants in non-endemic countries: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet Reg. Health Eur.20244610104010.1016/j.lanepe.2024.10104039290806 PMC 11407232 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Pérez-Molina J.A. Molina I. Chagas disease Lancet 2018391829410.1016/S 0140-6736(17)31612-428673423 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3de Sousa A.S. Vermeij D. Novaes Ramos A. Luquetti A.O. Chagas disease Lancet 202440320321810.1016/S 0140-6736(23)01787-738071985 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Ventura-Garcia L. Roura M. Pell C. Posada E. Gascon J. Aldasoro E. Munoz J. Pool R. Socio-cultural aspects of Chagas disease: A systematic review of qualitative research P Lo S Neglected Trop. Dis.20137 e 241010.1371/journal.pntd.000241024069473 PMC 3772024 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Marcili A. Lima L. Cavazzana M. Junqueira A.C. Veludo H.H. Maia Da Silva F. Campaner M. Paiva F. Nunes V.L. Teixeira M.M. A new genotype of Trypanosoma cruzi associated with bats evidenced by phylogenetic analyses using SSU r DNA, cytochrome b and Histone H 2B genes and genotyping based on ITS 1 r DNA Parasitology 200913664165510.1017/S 003118200900586119368741 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Zingales B. Andrade S.G. Briones M.R. Campbell D.A. Chiari E. Fernandes O. Guhl F. Lages-Silva E. Macedo A.M. Machado C.R. A new consensus for Trypanosoma cruzi intraspecific nomenclature: Second revision meeting recommends Tc I to Tc VI Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 20091041051105410.1590/S 0074-0276200900070002120027478 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Tibayrenc M. Genetic epidemiology of parasitic protozoa and other infectious agents: The need for an integrated approach Int. J. Parasitol.1998288510410.1016/S 0020-7519(97)00180-X 9504337 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Matthew Y. The Genetic Diversity of Trypanosoma cruzi, Multiclonality of Natural Populations and the Characterisation of Paraguayan Isolates and Experimentally Derived T. cruzi. I Hydrids Ph.D. Thesis London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London, UK 2004
