Neonatal Health Following IVF: Own Versus Donor Material in Singleton and Multiple Pregnancies
Lucia Elena Niculae, Raluca Tocariu, Evelyn-Denise Archir, Alexandru-Ștefan Niculae, Anca-Magdalena Coricovac, Diana-Elena Comandașu, Aida Petca, Elvira Brătilă

TL;DR
This study compares neonatal health outcomes in IVF pregnancies using donor versus autologous material, finding more complications in donor-conceived births.
Contribution
The study reveals higher rates of adverse neonatal outcomes in IVF pregnancies using donor material, particularly in multiple gestations.
Findings
IVF-D pregnancies show higher rates of preterm birth, low birthweight, and neonatal ventilation.
Donor-conceived neonates have increased congenital anomalies, especially cardiac malformations.
Neonatal survival rates are comparable between IVF-D and IVF-A groups despite other complications.
Abstract
This study investigates neonatal outcomes in singleton and multiple pregnancies following in vitro fertilization (IVF) using donor (IVF-D) versus autologous (IVF-A) material. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted with 988 neonates born between 2017 and 2024 across three tertiary neonatal units in Romania. The primary outcomes included preterm birth, low birthweight, neonatal asphyxia, and congenital malformations. IVF-D pregnancies were associated with a higher prevalence of adverse neonatal outcomes, particularly in multiple gestations. Preterm birth and low birthweight were more frequent in the IVF-D group, with donor-conceived neonates exhibiting increased rates of neonatal ventilation and prolonged hospitalization. Additionally, congenital anomalies, particularly cardiac malformations, were more prevalent in IVF-D pregnancies, suggesting possible immunological and epigenetic…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
