# Appropriate Distraction Strength for Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthroscopy

## TL;DR

This study determines the optimal distraction force for metatarsophalangeal joint arthroscopy based on joint size and gender differences.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific distraction forces for different MTP joints and highlights gender-based variations in joint space.

## Key findings

- MTP-2 joint has the largest natural joint size, while MTP-5 has the smallest.
- A 10 lb traction is sufficient for MTP-1 and MTP-4 joints during arthroscopy.
- Males have significantly larger joint space sizes than females for MTP-1 and MTP-4 joints.

## Abstract

Background and Objectives: To investigate the natural metatasophalangeal (MTP) joint distance, we studied the appropriate degree of distraction for arthroscopy and the associated factors, including age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). Materials and Methods: Sixty-seven patients who underwent MTP joint arthroscopy or foot and ankle surgery from April 2013 to June 2020 were enrolled. Foot plain radiographs were taken using a mini-fluoroscan with no traction, manual traction, and traction of 5 pounds, 10 pounds, and 15 pounds to measure the MTP joint distance. Age, gender, and BMI were compared as associated factors. The minimum joint distance of MTP joint arthroscopy was defined as 2.8 mm, which was the sheath size of a 1.9 mm, 30° high-definition arthroscope. Results: Regarding natural MTP joint space sizes, the MTP-2 joint had the largest joint size (2.39 ± 0.37 mm). The MTP-5 joint had the smallest joint size (1.59 ± 0.34 mm). Traction of 10 lb was an appropriate distraction force for the MTP-1 joint (3.09 ± 0.03 mm) and MTP-4 joint (3.07± 0.47 mm) in arthroscopy. Traction of 5lb was an appropriate distraction force for the MTP-2 (3.32 ± 0.60 mm), MTP-3 (2.89 ± 0.50 mm), and MTP-5 (2.97 ± 0.49 mm) joints. For the MTP-1 and MTP-4 joints, males had significantly greater joint space sizes than females for no traction (p = 0.039), manual traction (p = 0.002), and traction of 5 pounds (p = 0.004), 10 pounds, (p = 0.013), and 15 pounds (p = 0.024). There was no statistically significant difference in joint space size according to age or BMI for any MTP joints (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Among natural joint spaces without traction, the MTP-2 joint had the largest joint size while the MTP-5 joint had the smallest joint size. In MTP joint arthroscopy, a traction power of 10 lb is sufficient for appropriate distraction of all MTP joints. Less distraction power is required for males than for females, especially for the MTP-1 and MTP-4 joints.