An Evaluation of the Adequacy of the Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Endoscopy-Assisted Metopic, Coronal, or Sagittal Craniosynostosis Surgeries: A Retrospective Observational Study
Turan Evran, Emrah Egemen, Barış Albuz, İsmet Çopur, Rasim Asar, Aslı Mete Yıldız, Seher İlhan, Serkan Civlan, Hülya Sungurtekin

TL;DR
This study assesses whether a liberal blood transfusion strategy is effective in pediatric craniosynostosis surgeries, finding it maintains adequate blood cell mass.
Contribution
The study evaluates transfusion adequacy using ERCM ratios in endoscopic craniosynostosis surgeries for the first time.
Findings
Liberal transfusion maintained ERCM ratios within the 85–115% range across all craniosynostosis types.
Significant decreases in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were observed post-surgery.
Changes in blood loss and transfusion volumes were noted between 1-hour and 24-hour postoperative measurements.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the adequacy of the liberal transfusion strategy applied in patients undergoing endoscopy-assisted Metopic, Coronal, or Sagittal craniosynostosis surgery according to the Pre-Transfusion and Post-Transfusion Estimated Red Blood Cell Mass (ERCM) ratios. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study, conducted at the Pamukkale University Faculty of Medicine (2017–2023), utilized anesthesia, surgical records, and hospital electronic data of patients undergoing endoscopic craniosynostosis surgery. The primary endpoints were the rates of Post-Transfusion 1st-hour ERCM/Pre-Transfusion ERCM (%) and Post-Transfusion 24th-hour ERCM/Pre-Transfusion ERCM (%). The secondary endpoints were determined as Hemoglobin (Hb) and Hematocrit (Hct) values at the 1st and 24th hours after surgery, Calculated Blood Loss (CBL) during surgery (%),…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments · Cleft Lip and Palate Research · Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
