Catheter Ablation of Septal Accessory Pathways in Children: A 12-Year Experience at a Tertiary Care Center

TL;DR

This study shares a 12-year experience of catheter ablation for septal accessory pathways in children, showing similar success rates for cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation, with cryoablation being safer.

Contribution

The study provides a long-term pediatric experience of septal accessory pathway ablation with limited fluoroscopy and compares cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation outcomes.

Findings

Cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation showed similar acute and long-term success rates for septal accessory pathways in children.

Higher recurrence rates were observed at the right-posteroseptal location, suggesting the need for repeat procedures in some cases.

No complications were observed, and repeat procedures achieved a 99% long-term success rate.

Abstract

Background: Septal accessory pathways (APs) are challenging ablation targets. This study aims to contribute to the pediatric literature by presenting our long-term experience of septal AP ablations with limited fluoroscopy. Methods: This is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent septal AP ablations from July 2012 to July 2023 at a single center. Results: We identified 298 septal AP connections in 291 (11.8 ± 4.9 years) patients. Seventy-nine (27%) cases were diagnosed with supraventricular tachycardia, and 212 (73%) cases were diagnosed with Wolff–Parkinson–White (WPW). The AP locations were posteroseptal (n = 159; 54%), anteroseptal (n = 86; 30%), and midseptal (n = 46; 16%). Of those diagnosed with WPW, 61 (28%) had high-risk AP, and 90 (40%) were adenosine-responsive. Cryoablation was used in 190 (66%), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was used in 36 (12.5%), and both were used in 62 (21.5%) patients. The overall acute success rate of initial procedures was 89.6% (the acute success rate of cryoablation = 86.6%, and of RFA = 94.1%). No statistically significant difference was observed between cryoablation and RFA (p = 0.617). During a mean follow-up of 88.5 ± 33.0 months, the overall recurrence rate was 11.3% (cryoablation vs. RFA; p = 0.834), with the highest at the right-posteroseptal location. An irrigated-tip RFA was preferred during redo procedures in 20 (45%) cases. The long-term success rate was 99% when the repeat procedures were considered. No complications were observed. Conclusions: Due to the higher recurrence rates in septal AP ablations compared to other locations, repeated procedures might be needed to achieve definitive long-term success. This study indicates that similar acute and long-term success rates can be achieved with cryoablation compared to RFA, with the significant benefit of increased safety.

Figures