Prevalence of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (PROVA) Study

TL;DR

This study found that about 23% of patients with coronary artery spasm had a patent foramen ovale, which may contribute to their symptoms.

Contribution

The study is the first to investigate the prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with documented coronary artery spasm.

Findings

RLS due to PFO was observed in 23% of patients with coronary artery spasm.

Patients with RLS had worse angina symptoms compared to those without RLS.

RLS was more common in patients with coronary artery spasm and migraine.

Abstract

(1) Background: Prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in the general population is estimated at around 24%. We hypothesized that right-to-left shunting (RLS) resulting from PFO might contribute to angina symptoms in patients with coronary artery spasm (CAS), potentially triggered by vasoactive metabolites. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of PFO-related RLS in patients with documented CAS. (2) Methods: This single-center prospective cohort study included patients with documented CAS undergoing transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), including a contrast bubble study between 2021 and 2023. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) were used to survey patients. (3) Results: RLS (PFO group) was observed in 11 of the 48 patients included (23%). In the PFO group, 64% had epicardial spasm and 36% microvascular spasm. Furthermore, RLS was more prevalent in patients with CAS and concomitant migraine (29%). Remarkably, the density plot of the SAQ summary score showed a worse score for patients with RLS (median of 38 [Q1–Q3: 31–49]) than patients without RLS (median of 49 [Q1–Q3: 41–55]) (p = 0.0282). (4) Conclusions: The prevalence of RLS due to PFO in patients with CAS was in line with the PFO prevalence in the general population, and patients with RLS are more symptomatic according to the SAQ summary score. Whether PFO closure could be beneficial to patients with CAS and concomitant migraine requires further investigation.

Figures