# Understanding Alcohol Abuse in Deceased Donors: Effects on Liver Transplant Results

## TL;DR

This study shows that liver transplants from donors with a history of alcohol abuse can be as successful as those from non-drinking donors, helping to address the organ shortage.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates that alcohol-abusing deceased donors can provide viable livers with comparable outcomes to non-alcohol-using donors.

## Key findings

- Survival rates at 1 year were comparable between recipients of livers from alcohol-abusing and non-alcohol-using donors.
- Liver function outcomes were similar between the two donor groups.
- Expanding donor criteria to include alcohol-abusing donors can increase access to transplants.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Liver transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage liver disease. In recent years, the demand for liver transplantation has surpassed the supply of available donor organs. Utilizing extended-criteria donors (ECDs) alleviates the scarcity of suitable donor livers for transplantation. One of the ECD was donors with a history of alcohol abuse. Liver grafts from donors with a history of chronic and active alcohol abuse are typically promptly excluded, diminishing the available organ pool. This highlights the need to re-evaluate the donor exclusion criteria and expand the organ pool to address the ongoing shortage. Methods: We examined adult (>18 years) liver transplant recipients who received deceased donor livers and had a documented history of alcohol abuse between 2011 and 2024. Liver transplant indications were conventional and included hepatitis C virus (HCV), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, alcoholic liver disease coexisting with HCV, cryptogenic cirrhosis, chronic cholestatic liver disease, primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, metabolic liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, and alcoholic hepatitis. We compared the 1-year, 5-year, and 9-year survival rates with those of liver recipients from non-alcohol-consuming donors. Results: In total, 370 liver recipients from deceased donors with a documented history of alcohol abuse were included. At 1 year post-transplant, survival was comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: Liver transplantation from deceased donors with a history of alcohol abuse yielded survival rates and liver function outcomes comparable to those from non-alcohol-using donors. By expanding the criteria to include carefully screened alcohol-using donors, transplant programs can improve access to life-saving transplantations.