Site of Biopsy and Its Accuracy in Preoperative Diagnosis of Superficial Nonampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors: Retrospective Study
Yukihisa Fujinaga, Akira Mitoro, Hitoshi Mori, Satoshi Iwai, Takahiro Kubo, Misako Tanaka, Aritoshi Koizumi, Fumimasa Tomooka, Shohei Asada, Koh Kitagawa, Norihisa Nishimura, Shinya Sato, Kosuke Kaji, Tadashi Namisaki, Hitoshi Yoshiji

TL;DR
This study shows that biopsy accuracy for diagnosing duodenal tumors is low, but better on the oral side of the papilla of Vater.
Contribution
The study identifies location-based differences in biopsy accuracy for superficial nonampullary duodenal tumors.
Findings
Biopsy accuracy for carcinomas was 71.4%, with significant variation based on tumor location.
Oral-side tumors had higher biopsy accuracy (84.2%) compared to anal-side tumors (63.3%).
22.4% of adenomas were later reclassified as carcinomas after endoscopic resection.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: As endoscopy is increasingly being used to diagnose superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs), there is a growing need for their early detection and minimally invasive treatment. This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of biopsy specimens for SNADETs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinicopathologic data from 98 patients with SNADETs who had undergone endoscopic resection. The presurgical diagnosis, based on biopsy specimens, was compared with the histological diagnosis of the excised specimens. Results: Herein, preoperative biopsies were performed on 98 SNADETs specimens from 91 patients. Of the 68 adenomas and 30 carcinomas, 22.4% adenomas were later found to be carcinomas. Carcinoma biopsy diagnosis sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 54.6%, 80.0%, and 71.4%, respectively. Biopsy accuracy for carcinoma…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research · Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes · Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
