Consistency of Condom Use with Lubricants and Associated Factors Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Ghana: Evidence from Integrated Bio-Behavioral Surveillance Survey
Ratif Abdulai, Edith Phalane, Kyeremeh Atuahene, Isaiah Doe Kwao, Rita Afriyie, Yegnanew A. Shiferaw, Refilwe Nancy Phaswana-Mafuya

TL;DR
This study examines how often men who have sex with men in Ghana use condoms with lubricants and finds low usage linked to factors like education, religion, and income.
Contribution
The study identifies specific socio-demographic and behavioral factors influencing condom use with lubricants among MSM in Ghana, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.
Findings
Consistent condom use with lubricants was highest with male partners (44.9%) and lowest with all sexual partners (38.9%).
Higher education, HIV knowledge, and being a sex worker were associated with increased odds of consistent condom use.
Low income and religious affiliation (Islamic) were linked to decreased odds of consistent condom use.
Abstract
Several studies conducted worldwide have reported on the effectiveness of consistent condom use with lubricants in preventing HIV transmission and acquisition; however, men who have sex with men (MSM) in Ghana continue to be disproportionately affected by the HIV burden. They are stigmatized, discriminated against, and criminalized, leading to social isolation, reduced access to health care, and inadequate targeted interventions. The dissemination of HIV prevention tools such as condoms and lubricants is also mainly focused on the general population, and this approach overlooks the specific needs and vulnerabilities of MSM. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of consistent condom use with lubricants among MSM in Ghana. We analyzed cross-sectional data from the Ghana Men’s Study II dataset involving 4095 MSM aged 18 years and above. De-identified data were…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Sex work and related issues · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
