Perceived Benefits of Nature in Diverse Populations

TL;DR

This study explores how different groups perceive the health benefits of nature, finding that some demographics view these benefits as less valuable.

Contribution

The paper introduces new insights into how socioeconomic and demographic factors influence perceived benefits of nature.

Findings

Participants who identified as male, from minoritized populations, or with less education perceived nature as less beneficial.

Access to safe and convenient green spaces may help shift perceptions of nature's benefits.

Abstract

The relationship between socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and health effects of green spaces has been studied, suggesting that certain groups may reap more health benefits from exposure to nature. However, the link between the perceived benefits of nature and socioeconomic and demographic characteristics remains a gap in the literature. We used a subsample (n = 711, 2018–2019) from an environmental cardiovascular risk cohort to investigate the perceived benefits of nature. Participants completed an 11-item survey about their perceptions of the benefits of nature at in-person visits. Socioeconomic and demographic characteristics including income, education, race, biological sex at birth, and age, were self-reported. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate associations between the perceived benefits of nature and demographic and socioeconomic factors; odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Both unadjusted and fully adjusted models for race, age, sex, and education are reported. Our results suggest that participants who identified as male, a member of a minoritized population, and/or completing less education perceived nature as less beneficial. Although additional research is needed to better understand contributors to these perceptions, access to convenient, safe, and multi-use green spaces may be important in encouraging time in nature and shifting perceptions of the benefits of greenness.