# A New Prognostic Indicator for Biliary Tract Cancers: The ABIC Score

**Authors:** Doğan Bayram, Öznur Bal, Kemal Karaman, Murat Bardakçı, Derya Demirtaş Esmer, İsmet Seven, Serhat Sekmek, Perihan Perkin, Fahriye Tuğba Köş, Efnan Algın, Doğan Uncu

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/curroncol32040200 · Current Oncology · 2025-03-28

## TL;DR

This study shows that the ABIC score can predict survival in patients with biliary tract cancers, both non-metastatic and metastatic.

## Contribution

The ABIC score is validated as a new prognostic indicator for biliary tract cancer patients.

## Key findings

- High ABIC scores correlate with shorter survival in non-metastatic and metastatic BTC patients.
- Cutoff values of 6.89 and 7.41 for non-metastatic and metastatic BTC groups were identified.
- Tumor localization and stage affect non-metastatic BTC survival, while CEA and chemotherapy affect metastatic BTC survival.

## Abstract

Introduction: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) comprise a heterogeneous group of malignancies, including gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The main determinants of prognosis in BTC are the stage of the disease and the eligibility for curative treatment. Additionally, liver functional capacity is also one of the factors influencing survival in biliary tract cancers. The age–bilirubin–INR–creatinine (ABIC) score has been previously shown to predict prognosis in hepatic diseases. The aim of our study is to demonstrate the relationship between the ABIC score and prognosis in BTC. Materials and Methods: In this study, a retrospective analysis was performed on 41 patients with non-metastatic BTC and 73 patients with metastatic BTC who were followed up in our clinic between 2003 and 2025. All patients were ≥18 years old at the time of diagnosis, and BTC was pathologically confirmed. The ABIC score was calculated separately for each group. A threshold value for the ABIC score was determined using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, and based on this threshold, patients were divided into low and high ABIC score groups. Both the relationship between the ABIC score and prognosis and the other factors affecting prognosis were investigated. Results: In the non-metastatic BTC group, the cutoff value for the ABIC score was 6.89. The median survival time of patients with a high ABIC score was significantly shorter. In the metastatic BTC group, the cutoff value for the ABIC score was 7.41. Similarly, in this group, patients with a high ABIC score had a significantly shorter median survival time. Additionally, in the non-metastatic BTC group, tumor localization and stage were prognostic factors affecting survival, while in the metastatic BTC group, CEA and first-line chemotherapy were the prognostic factors influencing overall survival. Conclusions: We demonstrate that the ABIC score is a prognostic factor determining median survival in both non-metastatic and metastatic BTC patients.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** gallbladder cancer (MONDO:0003220), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MONDO:0003210)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** BTC (MESH:D001661), malignancies (MESH:D009369), gallbladder cancer (MESH:D005706), hepatic diseases (MESH:D056486), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (MESH:D018281)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12026096/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12026096/full.md

## References

20 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12026096/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12026096