# A Study of the Central Motor Drives Interactions Between the Eyes, and an Index Finger, and a Little Finger

## TL;DR

This study explores how eye movements and finger movements interact during object manipulation, revealing that motor drives to the eyes can suppress finger muscle activity.

## Contribution

The study reveals novel suppression effects of eye motor drives on finger muscles and the role of forearm position in modulating these interactions.

## Key findings

- Eye movements do not affect finger motor excitability, but eye motor drives suppress finger muscle activity.
- Concurrent finger movements suppress each other's motor excitability.
- Forearm position influences how eye and finger motor drives interact.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: When manipulating an object placed on the palm, the eyes and fingers move together. To perform this task precisely, coordination of the eyes and fingers is needed. Based on this view, the present study examined the three-way interaction among the central motor drives to the eyes, index finger, and little finger. Methods: Healthy male participants abducted the right index and/or little finger with or without concomitant saccadic eye movement to the right in response to a visual cue, while the forearm was in the pronated or supinated position. We measured the reaction time (RT), velocity, and amplitude of the eye movements, as well as the RT and amplitude of the electromyographic (EMG) responses in the prime movers for the independent and dependent finger movements. Results: The velocity, amplitude, and RT of the eye movement were not changed by the additional involvement of the finger movement, indicating that the central motor drive to the finger does not influence the eye motor excitability and central motor drive to the eyes. On the one hand, the RT of the finger was not changed by the eye movement, indicating that the central motor drive to the eyes does not influence the central motor drive to the finger muscle. On the other hand, the EMG amplitude in the first dorsal interosseous muscle at the movement onset decreased during the concomitant eye movement, indicating that the central motor drive to the eyes suppresses the motor excitability of the independent finger muscle. The RT increased and EMG amplitude decreased in one finger muscle when the other finger concurrently moved, indicating that the central motor drive to one finger muscle suppresses the motor excitability of and central motor drive to the other finger muscle. The change in the RT and EMG amplitude in one finger muscle caused by the concomitant execution of the other finger movement and/or eye movement varied with forearm position, indicating that forearm proprioception influences the interaction of the motor execution processes among the fingers and eyes. Conclusions: The central motor drive to the eyes or finger muscles suppresses the motor excitability of the other finger muscles and the central motor drive to that muscle, but the central motor drive to the finger muscles does not influence those for the eyes. Forearm proprioception influences the motor excitability of the finger muscle and central motor drive to that muscle.