Corrigendum: Anti-RBD IgG antibodies from endemic coronaviruses do not protect against the acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection among exposed uninfected individuals
Flávia Lopes Adami, Mateus Vidigal de Castro, Bianca da Silva Almeida, Isabela Pazotti Daher, Márcio Massao Yamamoto, Keity Souza Santos, Mayana Zatz, Michel Satya Naslavsky, Daniela Santoro Rosa, Edecio Cunha-Neto, Vivian Leite de Oliveira, Jorge Kalil, Silvia Beatriz Boscardin
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research · Animal Virus Infections Studies
In the published article, there was an error in Supplementary Figure 2. Specifically, the graph depicting HCoV-NL63, originally intended for panel B, was mistakenly replaced with the HCoV-OC43 graph, which was already present in panel D. This resulted in a duplication of the HCoV-OC43 data in both panels B and D. In addition, the HCoV-HKU1 and HCoV-OC43 graphs were misplaced in panels C and D, respectively. The correct order is HCoV-OC43 (C) and HCoV-HKU1 (D).
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.