Effect of Smartphone-Based Messaging on Interns and Nurses at an Academic Medical Center: Observational Study

TL;DR

This study examines how often interns and nurses message each other at a hospital, finding that interns receive far more messages and face communication challenges, especially at night.

Contribution

The study quantifies messaging patterns between interns and nurses, revealing communication burdens and diurnal variations in response times.

Findings

Interns exchanged 2.5 times more messages per day with nurses than vice versa.

Message response delays were longest at 4 AM and shortest at 8 AM.

Interns and nurses had distinct peaks in message volume during morning rounds and overnight shifts.

Abstract

Digital communication between nurses and medicine interns plays a crucial role in patient care. However, excessive messaging may contribute to alert fatigue, potentially affecting workflow efficiency and clinical decision-making. Although prior research has examined general messaging behaviors among clinicians, few studies have specifically analyzed messaging patterns between nurses and interns, who serve as primary points of contact in inpatient care.

This study aims to quantitatively characterize messaging patterns between the primary nurse and primary provider (ie, medicine intern) of hospitalized patients at an academic medical center in order to identify communication burdens and potential inefficiencies. By identifying trends in message volume, timing, and response rates, we seek to inform strategies to optimize communication workflows and mitigate alert fatigue.

At a large academic hospital (Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA), we analyzed secure messaging transactions between internal medicine interns and nurses across three medical-surgical units over 6 months. Transaction metadata, time stamps, and unique message tokens were extracted. Data processing was performed using Python, Microsoft Excel, and R. Message volume, interaction frequencies, and response times were analyzed using measures of central tendency and statistical tests of significance.

A total of 61,057 unique messages were exchanged between interns and nurses, with interns exchanging 2.5 times more messages per day with nurses than vice versa (P<.001). Messaging volume exhibited diurnal variation, indicating periods of increased communication burden. Interns read messages from nurses within a median of 35 (range: 0‐3589) seconds, whereas nurses read messages from interns within a median of 26 (range: 0‐3584) seconds (P<.001). The longest message response delays occurred at 4 AM, whereas the shortest occurred at 8 AM.

Interns experience a significantly higher messaging burden than nurses, with distinct peaks in message volume during morning rounds and overnight shifts. These findings suggest a need for interventions such as optimized digital communication protocols to reduce nonessential messaging and alert fatigue. Future research should explore the effectiveness of these interventions in enhancing workflow efficiency and the development of both in-person and digital interventions to optimize communication workflows and mitigate alert fatigue.

Figures