Infertility misperception and improper health-seeking behavior between urban and rural areas
Berli Kusuma, Achmad Kemal Harzif, Mila Maidarti, Yudianto Budi Saroyo, Hariyono Winarto, Alfa Putri Meutia

TL;DR
This study compares how urban and rural Indonesians perceive and respond to infertility, finding more misconceptions and delayed healthcare in rural areas.
Contribution
The study reveals urban-rural differences in infertility perception and health-seeking behavior in Indonesia.
Findings
Rural respondents have more misconceptions about infertility causes, such as believing stress is a leading risk factor.
A higher percentage of rural individuals seek advice from midwives rather than general practitioners.
Both urban and rural groups show a need for improved fertility education to address misconceptions and delay in seeking care.
Abstract
The prevalence of infertility among reproductive-age couples in Indonesia is around 10-15%. Lack of understanding, misleading myths, and negative attitudes could result in improper behavior. This study aims to reveal the discrepancy between perception and behavior towards infertility in urban and rural areas in Indonesia. A cross-sectional study using an internet-based questionnaire was given to 408 individuals, divided into two groups, Java and outside Java, representing urban and rural populations. The study included Indonesian citizens over 18 who were willing to participate, encompassing individuals of both genders, regardless of their fertility status. All participants completed the questionnaire from October 2020 to April 2021. Half of the respondents from both groups consider infertility a disease. All respondents have excellent access to information. Although more than 80% of…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive Health and Technologies · Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
