Comparative Quality Analysis of Bullous Pemphigoid Information Across Six Social Media Platforms
Ezdean Alkurdi, Robert Li, Dany Alkurdi, Omar Alani, Prem Patel, Zachary A Schwager

TL;DR
This study compares the quality of information about bullous pemphigoid on six social media platforms, finding that X provides the most reliable content while TikTok offers the least.
Contribution
The study introduces a comparative analysis of health information quality on multiple social media platforms using standardized evaluation tools.
Findings
X had the highest reliability with mean QUEST and DISCERN scores of 16.8 and 28.9, respectively.
TikTok had the lowest reliability with mean QUEST and DISCERN scores of 9.0 and 20.1, respectively.
Educational content was most common on YouTube and Threads, while TikTok featured more patient experience content.
Abstract
Social media has changed the digital health landscape, altering how the public consumes medical information and sparking concerns about the reliability of medical information. This study aims to assess the quality of online health information related to bullous pemphigoid by evaluating content type, information reliability, and user engagement across different social media platforms, using the Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST) and Discerning the Quality of Written Consumer Health Information (DISCERN) questionnaires, quantitative tools designed to measure health information quality. Among the six social media platforms analyzed, educational content was most prevalent on YouTube (Google LLC, Mountain View, California, United States) (90.0%, n=10) and Threads (Meta Platforms, Inc., Menlo Park, California, United States) (100.0%, n=3), while TikTok (ByteDance Ltd., Beijing, China)…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSocial Media in Health Education · Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases · Advertising and Communication Studies
