Esthetic and Functional Outcomes of Superficial Parotidectomy Comparing Three Reconstruction Techniques: An Interventional Clinical Study
Sherif Mohammad Askar, Abd ElRaof Said Mohamed, Tamer Oraby, Ibrahim Khaled, Mahmoud Megahed, Ali Awad

TL;DR
This study compares three reconstruction techniques after a parotidectomy surgery, finding that fat grafting provides the best aesthetic results and patient satisfaction after one year.
Contribution
The study introduces a comparative analysis of three specific reconstruction techniques for post-parotidectomy defects, highlighting the superior outcomes of en-block fat grafting.
Findings
The fat-graft group had the highest patient satisfaction scores at six and twelve months post-surgery.
Fat grafting showed significantly better outcomes compared to the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap and platelet-rich fibrin gel techniques.
Fat grafting resulted in minimal surgical site morbidity and a lower risk of Frey syndrome.
Abstract
Introduction Preauricular defect is one of the main concerns after superficial parotidectomy. Plastic surgeons have described many filling techniques to overcome the problem. Objective To discuss three reconstruction techniques after superficial parotidectomy: partial-thickness, superiorly based sternocleidomastoid muscle flap; en-bloc fat graft; and platelet-rich fibrin gel, with a comparison of aesthetic and functional outcomes. Methods The present study included 29 adult patients submitted to reconstruction after superficial parotidectomy by partial-thickness, superiorly based sternocleidomastoid muscle flap, en-bloc fat graft, and platelet-rich fibrin gel. A subjective evaluation of the facial nerve functions was conducted through a visual analog scale (VAS) with scores from 0 to 5, which was completed by the patient, a close relative, and 3 blinded staff members. Results…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSalivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment · Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology · Cleft Lip and Palate Research
