# Utility of venoactive compounds in post-thrombotic syndrome: A systematic review

## TL;DR

This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of venoactive compounds in preventing and treating post-thrombotic syndrome, finding moderate evidence of benefits but calling for more high-quality studies.

## Contribution

The study provides a systematic review of the current evidence on venoactive compounds for post-thrombotic syndrome, highlighting gaps in recent high-quality research.

## Key findings

- Venoactive compounds improved venous symptoms, reduced edema, and helped heal venous ulcers.
- Diosmin and MPFF showed potential as adjuncts to rivaroxaban in preventing post-thrombotic syndrome.
- Most studies were older and had low or unclear risk of bias, indicating a need for new high-quality trials.

## Abstract

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) has been highly prevalent; over 50% of the patients develop PTS after lower extremity acute deep vein thrombosis. Venoactive compounds (VACs) have been recommended for decades for patients with chronic venous insufficiency, including PTS. The objective of our study was to perform a systematic review to determine the quality of evidence on the utility of VACs for both prevention and treatment of PTS.

A systematic review was conducted to search the literature between January 1, 1980, and July 14, 2023, for venoactive drugs or medications, deep vein thrombosis, and PTS using PubMed, MEDLINE, life science journals, and the Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English were included in this review. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs were used.

Ninety-four references were identified; 11 RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria. VACs administered were diosmin, hidrosmin/rutosides, micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF), and sulodexide. The studies included a highly variable proportion of patients with PTS (8.6%-100%). Some older studies omitted details of the methodology. Two studies suggested benefit of diosmin and MPFF as adjunctive treatment to rivaroxaban in the prevention of PTS and showed low or unclear risk of bias. Evaluation of RCTs for the treatment of post-thrombotic chronic venous insufficiency found low or unclear risk of bias in 81.6% to 85.7%. All studies suggested that VACs were beneficial for PTS treatment; they improved venous symptoms, decreased edema, and helped heal venous ulcers.

This systematic review found that VACs had at least moderate quality of evidence in improving venous symptoms, decreasing edema, and accelerating venous ulcer healing. Two pilot RCTs of higher quality suggested the usefulness of diosmin and MPFF as adjunctive treatment to rivaroxaban therapy to reduce the incidence of PTS and improve deep vein recanalization. Because most RCTs were published over two decades ago, and several lacked the required precision in reporting, new high-quality, low-bias RCTs are needed to assess the role of specific VACs for both prevention and treatment of PTS.