This paper is marked retracted in the scholarly record (OpenAlex). Interpret its findings with caution.
RETRACTION: Wound Healing Rates in COPD Patients Undergoing Traditional Pulmonary Rehabilitation Versus Tailored Wound‐Centric Interventions

TL;DR
This retracted study compared wound healing in COPD patients using traditional rehabilitation versus tailored wound interventions.
Contribution
The paper was retracted due to a compromised peer review process and does not present valid new findings.
Findings
The article was retracted after an investigation found it was accepted due to a compromised peer review process.
The authors and editors agreed to the retraction, indicating no valid conclusions can be drawn from the study.
Abstract
RETRACTION: HeY. , ZhuH. , XuW. , WangT. , and ChenY. , “Wound Healing Rates in COPD Patients Undergoing Traditional Pulmonary Rehabilitation Versus Tailored Wound‐Centric Interventions,” International Wound Journal 21, no. 4 (2024): e14863, 10.1111/iwj.14863.38606653 PMC11009941 The above article, published online on 12 April 2024, in Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor in Chief, Professor Keith Harding; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Following an investigation by the publisher, all parties have concluded that this article was accepted solely on the basis of a compromised peer review process. The editors have therefore decided to retract the article. The authors agree with the retraction.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
